From: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
mkubecek@suse.cz, netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4] tcp: Dump bound-only sockets in inet_diag.
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 11:58:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZW2w3YyNMoyN1t97@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89i+QvbYLFoMkr6NTj2+7eHsZ=s9wo3gpdF1BpH3ejXFEgw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 09:41:16PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 9:34 PM Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
>
> > > + goto next_bind;
> > > +
> > > + if (sk->sk_state != TCP_CLOSE ||
> > > + !inet->inet_num)
> >
> > Sorry for missing this in the previous version, but I think
> > inet_num is always non-zero because 0 selects a port automatically
> > and the min of ipv4_local_port_range is 1.
> >
>
> This is not true, because it can be cleared by another thread, before
> unhashing happens in __inet_put_port()
>
> Note the test should use READ_ONCE(inet->inet_num), but I did not
> mention this, as many reads of inet_num are racy.
Would you like me to send a v5, or do you prefer to let a future series
fix all the racy reads and writes at once?
Personally, I feel it'd look strange to have a READ_ONCE() only in
inet_diag_dump_icsk(), while the rest of the stack accesses it
directly. But just let me know if you feel otherwise and I'll post a
v5.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-04 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-01 14:49 [PATCH net-next v4] tcp: Dump bound-only sockets in inet_diag Guillaume Nault
2023-12-01 20:34 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-12-01 20:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2023-12-01 21:23 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-12-04 10:58 ` Guillaume Nault [this message]
2023-12-04 12:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2023-12-04 23:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZW2w3YyNMoyN1t97@debian \
--to=gnault@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox