netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	 edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	 lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	toke@redhat.com,  willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com,
	jasowang@redhat.com,  kernel-team <kernel-team@cloudflare.com>,
	Yan Zhai <yan@cloudflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] xdp: add multi-buff support for xdp running in generic mode
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 10:49:12 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZWjZKPYCglmjFJUH@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZWhpGWDP6mrM-Y35@lore-desk>

On 11/30, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 11/30/23 10:11, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > > Similar to native xdp, do not always linearize the skb in
> > > netif_receive_generic_xdp routine but create a non-linear xdp_buff to be
> > > processed by the eBPF program. This allow to add  multi-buffer support
> > > for xdp running in generic mode.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > >   net/core/dev.c | 144 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > >   1 file changed, 119 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> > > index 4df68d7f04a2..0d08e755bb7f 100644
> > > --- a/net/core/dev.c
> > > +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> > > @@ -4853,6 +4853,12 @@ u32 bpf_prog_run_generic_xdp(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
> > >   	xdp_init_buff(xdp, frame_sz, &rxqueue->xdp_rxq);
> > >   	xdp_prepare_buff(xdp, hard_start, skb_headroom(skb) - mac_len,
> > >   			 skb_headlen(skb) + mac_len, true);
> > > +	if (skb_is_nonlinear(skb)) {
> > > +		skb_shinfo(skb)->xdp_frags_size = skb->data_len;
> > > +		xdp_buff_set_frags_flag(xdp);
> > > +	} else {
> > > +		xdp_buff_clear_frags_flag(xdp);
> > > +	}
> > >   	orig_data_end = xdp->data_end;
> > >   	orig_data = xdp->data;
> > > @@ -4882,6 +4888,14 @@ u32 bpf_prog_run_generic_xdp(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
> > >   		skb->len += off; /* positive on grow, negative on shrink */
> > >   	}
> > > +	/* XDP frag metadata (e.g. nr_frags) are updated in eBPF helpers
> > > +	 * (e.g. bpf_xdp_adjust_tail), we need to update data_len here.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	if (xdp_buff_has_frags(xdp))
> > > +		skb->data_len = skb_shinfo(skb)->xdp_frags_size;
> > > +	else
> > > +		skb->data_len = 0;
> > > +
> > >   	/* check if XDP changed eth hdr such SKB needs update */
> > >   	eth = (struct ethhdr *)xdp->data;
> > >   	if ((orig_eth_type != eth->h_proto) ||
> > > @@ -4915,54 +4929,134 @@ u32 bpf_prog_run_generic_xdp(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
> > >   	return act;
> > >   }
> > > -static u32 netif_receive_generic_xdp(struct sk_buff **pskb,
> > > -				     struct xdp_buff *xdp,
> > > -				     struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog)
> > > +static int netif_skb_check_for_generic_xdp(struct sk_buff **pskb,
> > > +					   struct bpf_prog *prog)
> > 
> > I like this is split out into a check function.
> > 
> > >   {
> > >   	struct sk_buff *skb = *pskb;
> > > -	u32 act = XDP_DROP;
> > > -
> > > -	/* Reinjected packets coming from act_mirred or similar should
> > > -	 * not get XDP generic processing.
> > > -	 */
> > > -	if (skb_is_redirected(skb))
> > > -		return XDP_PASS;
> > 
> > (For other reviewers)
> > This reinjected check is moved further down.
> > 
> > > +	int err;
> > > -	/* XDP packets must be linear and must have sufficient headroom
> > > -	 * of XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM bytes. This is the guarantee that also
> > > -	 * native XDP provides, thus we need to do it here as well.
> > > +	/* XDP does not support fraglist so we need to linearize
> > > +	 * the skb.
> > >   	 */
> > > -	if (skb_cloned(skb) || skb_is_nonlinear(skb) ||
> > > -	    skb_headroom(skb) < XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM) {
> > > +	if (skb_has_frag_list(skb) || !prog->aux->xdp_has_frags) {
> > >   		int hroom = XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM - skb_headroom(skb);
> > >   		int troom = skb->tail + skb->data_len - skb->end;
> > >   		/* In case we have to go down the path and also linearize,
> > >   		 * then lets do the pskb_expand_head() work just once here.
> > >   		 */
> > > -		if (pskb_expand_head(skb,
> > > -				     hroom > 0 ? ALIGN(hroom, NET_SKB_PAD) : 0,
> > > -				     troom > 0 ? troom + 128 : 0, GFP_ATOMIC))
> > > -			goto do_drop;
> > > -		if (skb_linearize(skb))
> > > -			goto do_drop;
> > > +		err = pskb_expand_head(skb,
> > > +				       hroom > 0 ? ALIGN(hroom, NET_SKB_PAD) : 0,
> > > +				       troom > 0 ? troom + 128 : 0, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > > +		if (err)
> > > +			return err;
> > > +
> > > +		err = skb_linearize(skb);
> > > +		if (err)
> > > +			return err;
> > > +
> > > +		return 0;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	/* XDP packets must have sufficient headroom of XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM
> > > +	 * bytes. This is the guarantee that also native XDP provides,
> > > +	 * thus we need to do it here as well.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	if (skb_cloned(skb) || skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags ||
> > 
> > I though we could allow a SKB with skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags (that isn't
> > cloned or shared) to be processed by generic XDP without any reallocation?
> 
> I do not think so, we discussed about it with Jakub here [0]
> 
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231128105145.7b39db7d@kernel.org/

Can this be done as an optimization later on? If, from the bpf side,
the verifier can attest that the program is not calling
bpf_xdp_{load,store}_bytes on the frags for example.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-30 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-30  9:11 [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] add multi-buff support for xdp running in generic mode Lorenzo Bianconi
2023-11-30  9:11 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 1/2] xdp: rely on skb pointer reference in do_xdp_generic and netif_receive_generic_xdp Lorenzo Bianconi
2023-11-30  9:52   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-11-30  9:11 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 2/2] xdp: add multi-buff support for xdp running in generic mode Lorenzo Bianconi
2023-11-30 10:36   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-11-30 10:51     ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2023-11-30 18:49       ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2023-12-01  9:33         ` Lorenzo Bianconi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZWjZKPYCglmjFJUH@google.com \
    --to=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com \
    --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=yan@cloudflare.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).