From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
Cc: "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Heiner Kallweit" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Marek Behún" <kabel@kernel.org>, "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Eric Woudstra" <ericwouds@gmail.com>,
"John Crispin" <john@phrozen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: phylink: set phy_state interface when attaching SFP
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2023 09:18:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZWr2ctwiBak7r263@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZWojqBKfZvShtjel@makrotopia.org>
On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 06:19:20PM +0000, Daniel Golle wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 08:28:20AM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 04:56:20AM +0000, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > > Assume 'usxgmii' being set as initial interface mode in DTS. Now plug
> > > a 2.5GBase-T SFP module with exposed PHY. Currently this results in
> > > a rather bizare situation:
> > >
> > > RTL8221B-VB-CG 2.5Gbps PHY (C45) i2c:sfp1-wan:11: rtl822x_c45_get_features: supported=00,00000000,00008000,000080ef
> > > mtk_soc_eth 15100000.ethernet eth2: requesting link mode phy/2500base-x with support 00,00000000,00008000,0000e0ef
> > > mtk_soc_eth 15100000.ethernet eth2: switched to phy/2500base-x link mode <<< !!!!!!
> > > mtk_soc_eth 15100000.ethernet eth2: major config usxgmii <<< !!!!!!
> > > mtk_soc_eth 15100000.ethernet eth2: phylink_mac_config: mode=phy/usxgmii/none adv=00,00000000,00000000,00000000 pause=00
> > > mtk_soc_eth 15100000.ethernet eth2: PHY [i2c:sfp1-wan:11] driver [RTL8221B-VB-CG 2.5Gbps PHY (C45)] (irq=POLL)
> > > mtk_soc_eth 15100000.ethernet eth2: phy: 2500base-x setting supported 00,00000000,00008000,0000e0ef advertising 00,00000000,00008000,0000e0ef
> > >
> > > Then the link seemingly comes up (but is dead) because no subsequent
> > > call to phylink_major_config actually configured MAC and PCS for
> > > 2500base-x mode.
> > >
> > > This is because phylink_mac_initial_config() considers
> > > pl->phy_state.interface if in MLO_AN_PHY mode while
> > > phylink_sfp_set_config() only sets pl->link_config.interface.
> > >
> > > Also set pl->phy_state.interface in phylink_sfp_set_config().
> >
> > Does it _actually_ matter?
>
> It does matter, I'm suggesting this change because the SFP module
> won't work without it.
>
> > When the PHY's link comes up, doesn't it get sorted out for the real
> > mode that will be used?
>
> That does happen once the interface mode *changes* to anything else,
> than 2500M/Full and the PHY driver sets state->interface to SGMII.
> However, initially it does *not* happen, probably because phylink
> ends up believing MAC and PCS are already operating in 2500base-x
> mode (but that's not the case).
>
> Previously (eg. with the BananaPi R3) this has not been a problem
> because the default interface mode defined in device tree anyway has
> also been 2500base-x. Now that I'm testing the same module with the
> R4 which uses usxgmii by default the problem surfaced.
Okay, I think what we have here is an ordering issue in
phylink_sfp_connect_phy(). phylink_bringup_phy() will set
phy_state.interface, but that happens after the major config has
happened.
With a built-in PHY, the sequence would be:
- connect to PHY (which calls phylink_bringup_phy())
- phylink_start() (which calls phylink_major_config())
whereas in this case we have the reverse. That needs to be sorted.
I can't do that over this weekend, but if you remind me I'll look
at it next week.
Thanks.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-02 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-25 4:56 [PATCH net] net: phylink: set phy_state interface when attaching SFP Daniel Golle
2023-11-25 8:28 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2023-12-01 18:19 ` Daniel Golle
2023-12-02 9:18 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZWr2ctwiBak7r263@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=daniel@makrotopia.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=ericwouds@gmail.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=john@phrozen.org \
--cc=kabel@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pali@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).