From: "Ramón Nordin Rodriguez" <ramon.nordin.rodriguez@ferroamp.se>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] net: microchip_t1s: additional phy support and collision detect handling
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 13:10:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZXWqrPkaJD2i5g-d@builder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <270f74c0-4a1d-4a82-a77c-0e8a8982e80f@lunn.ch>
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 05:03:54PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > * 3-4 nodes (depending on how many usb ports and dongles I have)
> > * run iperf with long cables and CSMA/CD
> > * run iperf with long cables and CMSA/No CD
> >
> > I'll report back the results. Anything you'd like to add/focus on with
> > evaluation?
>
> Humm, thinking about how CSMA/CD works...
>
> Maybe look at what counters the MAC provides. Does it have collisions
> and bad FCS? A collision should result in a bad FCS, if you are not
> using CD. So if things are working correctly, the count for CD should
> move to FCS if you turn CD off. If CD is falsely triggering, FCS as a
> % should not really change, but you probably get more frames over the
> link?
>
# setup
Andrew suggested that I try to get statistics from the MAC, I did some
investigation here but could not figure it out.
Using iperf3
Client: Arm based system running lan865x macphy
Server: PC running lan867x revB usb dongle
# test results
The results below should be considered fairly represenative but far from
perfect. There was some bounce up and down when rerunning, but these resutls
are an eye-ball average.
No meaningful difference was seen with short (2m) cables or long (12m).
## with collision detection enabled
iperf3 normal
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 5.54 MBytes 4.65 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 5.40 MBytes 4.53 Mbits/sec receiver
iperf3 reverse
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 929 KBytes 761 Kbits/sec 293 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 830 KBytes 680 Kbits/sec receiver
## with collision detection disabled
iperf3 normal
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 6.39 MBytes 5.36 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.04 sec 6.19 MBytes 5.17 Mbits/sec receiver
iperf3 reverse
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.27 sec 1.10 MBytes 897 Kbits/sec 268 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 1.01 MBytes 843 Kbits/sec receiver
# Conclusions
The arm system running the lan865x macphy uses a not yet mainlined driver, see
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231023154649.45931-1-Parthiban.Veerasooran@microchip.com/
The lan865x driver crashed out every once in a while on reverse mode, there
is definetly something biased in the driver for tx over rx.
Then again it's not accepted yet.
Disabling collision detection seemes to have an positive effect.
Slightly higher speeds and slightly fewer retransmissions.
I don't have a black and white result to present, but things seems to work
slightly better with CD disabled, so I'm leaning towards just unconditionally
disabling it for the lan865x and lan867x phys for the v2 patch.
I'll wait with submitting v2 for a day so anyone interested gets a
chance to weigh in on this.
R
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-10 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-27 10:40 [PATCH 0/3] net: microchip_t1s: additional phy support and collision detect handling Ramón N.Rodriguez
2023-11-27 10:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] net: microchip_t1s: refactor reset functionality Ramón N.Rodriguez
2023-11-27 13:27 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-11-27 10:40 ` [PATCH 2/3] net: microchip_t1s: add support for LAN867x Rev.C1 Ramón N.Rodriguez
2023-11-27 13:37 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-11-27 14:02 ` Ramón Nordin Rodriguez
2023-12-05 10:20 ` Félix Piédallu
2023-12-06 20:58 ` Ramón Nordin Rodriguez
2023-11-27 10:40 ` [PATCH 3/3] net: microchip_t1s: conditional collision detection Ramón N.Rodriguez
2023-11-27 16:00 ` Parthiban.Veerasooran
2023-11-27 16:32 ` Ramón Nordin Rodriguez
2023-11-28 6:52 ` Parthiban.Veerasooran
2023-11-28 9:18 ` Ramón Nordin Rodriguez
2023-11-27 13:58 ` [PATCH 0/3] net: microchip_t1s: additional phy support and collision detect handling Andrew Lunn
2023-11-27 15:30 ` Ramón Nordin Rodriguez
2023-11-27 16:03 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-11-28 8:57 ` Ramón Nordin Rodriguez
2023-12-10 12:10 ` Ramón Nordin Rodriguez [this message]
2023-12-11 13:54 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZXWqrPkaJD2i5g-d@builder \
--to=ramon.nordin.rodriguez@ferroamp.se \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).