From: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
wizhao@redhat.com, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Subject: Re: Mirred broken WAS(Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] act_mirred: use the backlog for nested calls to mirred ingress
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 14:07:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZXcJrNZxt5uY1sdn@dcaratti.users.ipa.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM0EoMmvjwxLmdT5pQJ-hXVMA2OJUfy8TJKDxZ=vf+Thzza0=Q@mail.gmail.com>
hello Jamal,
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 09:10:13AM -0500, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> Hi Davide,
>
[...]
> > > > I am afraid this broke things. Here's a simple use case which causes
> > > > an infinite loop (that we found while testing blockcasting but
> > > > simplified to demonstrate the issue):
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > sudo ip netns exec p4node tc qdisc add dev port0 clsact
> > > > sudo ip netns exec p4node tc filter add dev port0 ingress protocol ip
> > > > prio 10 matchall action mirred ingress redirect dev port0
> > >
> > > the above rule is taking packets from port0 ingress and putting it
> > > again in the mirred ingress of the same device, hence the loop.
> >
> > Right - that was intentional to show the loop. We are worrying about
> > extending mirred now to also broadcast (see the blockcast discussion)
> > to more ports making the loop even worse. The loop should terminate at
> > some point - in this case it does not...
> >
> > > I don't see it much different than what we can obtain with bridges:
> > >
> > > # ip link add name one type veth peer name two
> > > # ip link add name three type veth peer name four
> > > # for n in even odd; do ip link add name $n type bridge; done
> > > # for n in one two three four even odd; do ip link set dev $n up; done
> > > # for n in one three; do ip link set dev $n master odd; done
> > > # for n in two four; do ip link set dev $n master even; done
> > >
> >
> > Sure that is another way to reproduce.
>
> Ok, so i can verify that re-introduction of the ttl field in the
> skb[1] fixes the issue. But restoring that patch may cause too much
> bikeshedding. Victor will work on a better approach using the cb
> struct instead - there may. Are you able to test with/out your patch
> and see if this same patch fixes it?
I'm also more optimistic on the use of qdisc cb for that purpose :)
Just share the code, i will be happy to review/test.
With regular TC mirred, the deadlock happened with TCP and SCTP socket
locks, as they were sending an ACK back for a packet that was sent by
the peer using egress->ingress.
AFAIR there is a small reproducer in tc_actions.sh kselftest, namely
mirred_egress_to_ingress_tcp_test()
maybe it's useful for pre-verification also.
[...]
my 2 cents below:
> > I dont think we can run something equivalent inside the kernel. The
> > ttl worked fine. BTW, the example shown breaks even when you have
> > everything running on a single cpu (and packets being queued on the
> > backlog)
[...]
> > Yes, we need to make sure those are fixed with whatever replacement..
> > The loops will happen even on egress->egress (the example only showed
> > ingress-ingress).
if you try to make a loop using mirred egress/redirect, the first packet
will trigger a deadlock on the root qdisc lock - see [1]. It's worse
than a loop, because user can't fix it by just removing the "offending"
mirred action. Would the ttl be helpful here?
(in the meanwhile, I ill try to figure out if it's possible at least to
silence false lockdep warnings without using dynamic keys, as per
Eric reply).
TIA!
--
davide
[1] https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/451#issuecomment-1782690200
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-11 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-20 17:01 [PATCH net-next 0/2] net/sched: use the backlog for nested mirred ingress Davide Caratti
2023-01-20 17:01 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] net/sched: act_mirred: better wording on protection against excessive stack growth Davide Caratti
2023-01-23 17:22 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2023-01-23 19:40 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2023-01-20 17:01 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] act_mirred: use the backlog for nested calls to mirred ingress Davide Caratti
2023-01-23 17:22 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2023-01-23 19:41 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2023-12-04 20:24 ` Mirred broken WAS(Re: " Jamal Hadi Salim
2023-12-05 10:54 ` Davide Caratti
2023-12-05 15:12 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2023-12-07 14:10 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2023-12-11 13:07 ` Davide Caratti [this message]
2023-12-11 15:50 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2023-01-24 9:40 ` [PATCH net-next 0/2] net/sched: use the backlog for nested " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZXcJrNZxt5uY1sdn@dcaratti.users.ipa.redhat.com \
--to=dcaratti@redhat.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=wizhao@redhat.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).