From: Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@intel.com>
To: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Cc: Joshua Hay <joshua.a.hay@intel.com>,
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
<maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>, <emil.s.tantilov@intel.com>,
<larysa.zaremba@intel.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>, <alan.brady@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net] idpf: enable WB_ON_ITR
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:23:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZXmwR4s25afUbwz3@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <78ecdb9f-25e9-4847-87ed-6e8b44a7c71d@molgen.mpg.de>
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 05:50:55PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Michal, dear Joshua,
>
>
> Thank you for your patch.
>
> On 12/12/23 15:55, Michal Kubiak wrote:
> > From: Joshua Hay <joshua.a.hay@intel.com>
> >
> > Tell hardware to writeback completed descriptors even when interrupts
>
> Should you resend, the verb is spelled with a space: write back.
Sure, I will fix it.
>
> > are disabled. Otherwise, descriptors might not be written back until
> > the hardware can flush a full cacheline of descriptors. This can cause
> > unnecessary delays when traffic is light (or even trigger Tx queue
> > timeout).
>
> How can the problem be reproduced and the patch be verified?
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul
>
>
Hi Paul,
To be honest, I have noticed the problem during the implementation of
AF_XDP feature for IDPF driver. In my scenario, I had 2 Tx queues:
- regular LAN Tx queue
- and XDP Tx queue
added to the same q_vector attached to the same NAPI, so those 2 Tx
queues were handled in the same NAPI poll loop.
Then, when I started a huge Tx zero-copy trafic using AF_XDP (on the XDP
queue), and, at the same time, tried to xmit a few packets using the second
(non-XDP) queue (e.g. with scapy), I was getting the Tx timeout on that regular
LAN Tx queue.
That is why I decided to upstream this fix. With disabled writebacks,
there is no chance to get the completion descriptor for the queue where
the traffic is much lighter.
I have never tried to reproduce the scenario described by Joshua
in his original patch ("unnecessary delays when traffic is light").
Thanks,
Michal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-13 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-12 14:55 [PATCH iwl-net] idpf: enable WB_ON_ITR Michal Kubiak
2023-12-12 16:50 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Paul Menzel
2023-12-13 13:23 ` Michal Kubiak [this message]
2023-12-13 13:51 ` Michal Kubiak
2023-12-13 22:22 ` Nguyen, Anthony L
2023-12-13 23:06 ` Tony Nguyen
2023-12-15 17:27 ` Michal Kubiak
2023-12-14 12:59 ` Paul Menzel
2023-12-15 17:32 ` Michal Kubiak
2023-12-15 18:01 ` Brett Creeley
2023-12-15 19:04 ` Michal Kubiak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZXmwR4s25afUbwz3@localhost.localdomain \
--to=michal.kubiak@intel.com \
--cc=alan.brady@intel.com \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=emil.s.tantilov@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=joshua.a.hay@intel.com \
--cc=larysa.zaremba@intel.com \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).