Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: skip LED triggers on PHYs on SFP modules

["Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>]

On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 10:08:25AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 03:35:12PM +0100, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> > Hi Daniel
> > 
> > On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 00:05:35 +0000
> > Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Calling led_trigger_register() when attaching a PHY located on an SFP
> > > module potentially (and practically) leads into a deadlock.
> > > Fix this by not calling led_trigger_register() for PHYs localted on SFP
> > > modules as such modules actually never got any LEDs.
> > 
> > While I don't have a fix for this issue, I think your justification
> > isn't good. This isn't about having LEDs on the module or not, but
> > rather the PHY triggering LED events for LEDS that can be located
> > somewhere else on the system (like the front pannel of a switch).
> 
> SFP LEDs are very unlikely to be on the front panel, since there is no
> such pins on the SFP cage.
> 
> Russell, in your collection of SFPs do you have any with LEDs?

No, and we should _not_ mess around with the "LED" configuration on
PHYs on SFPs. It's possible that the LED output is wired to the LOS
pin on the module, and messing around with the configuration of that
would be asking for trouble.

In any case, I thought we didn't drive the LED configuration on PHYs
where the LED configuration isn't described by firmware - and as the
PHY on SFP modules would never be described by firmware, hooking
such a PHY up to the LED framework sounds like a waste of resources
to me.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!