From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-oa1-f43.google.com (mail-oa1-f43.google.com [209.85.160.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 621303C0A for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 02:26:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="ZPPu7cZZ" Received: by mail-oa1-f43.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-205f223639fso2439005fac.2 for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2024 18:26:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1704853582; x=1705458382; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=E+R2xX+FIqriBoo7t56wIQ9YxjMjCLhe/aGI/TnXo8w=; b=ZPPu7cZZkuxuZiP0n8RH/IOWclmi/2kryRK2pHNAsWcTdLWfdMrYi7M3f7gs9UGD6Q /lJtEp2gOBxHvrnhWXw0WtS4qNldtrEbY1W02iam1zanzNI+tW+WD/ynpg3NGzvWO74k Urv1gwZS03s9a30tZf4p1CmdG69gJDx4XF0EeVGsCv0AhdUwF+Wnl5m4JsFc0idMuAKa CmfUq/SICvCpYZ9dOP/V+7YAxSUc96kJkh3KiOWTrYJI5Ed9oKBrat5jdz1noJi07xOA rGmZTgqCBXFKCpnZspcP6TtM47s6XtJbzrqrr8LropeAL/LaAoJnDodokmj+27/1k6Th qYHQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704853582; x=1705458382; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=E+R2xX+FIqriBoo7t56wIQ9YxjMjCLhe/aGI/TnXo8w=; b=Kz7urGC1886v/GFiaKbkDQGGc8TqTm70O+9I+xPVRHleuCRDhDWFUYLXwd6ikpgVD6 exyeF6f0vO4z2aYVATDWnMk2C1mIfZdQ1pGhZq+o/HinomGMeOavPYlTd/jnVrAUrlHw t0lUbsYDjtrgRojzSY3gDAJiFt1vp0e5xFOj2lHWcuF8oehsicw1nKs1glht9nUfT99Q JA/o+G4pfSPvVaFgN4aIFRpWgemnqSRRqF4OOEY0CQp+qBVF91rVpAM2OKgW6zJpr8y5 zvrJNzXkX46O3fF6FRfoAFJsMJuTKj+3aRyUqwrIeK0D9ziApAdyIEsJDBVVa7Mvy684 H6hA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxcNW5EOlg8jAIl11nKW//kdHPI411a/RymOTQN5FjB3QGjcNo8 UCdgq0IvDsv8RXlNGxxEmrC2qa3J369mzmaq X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGxCzL2MLb2Uff1sihLCwm7KhSTbOOKfyiLjiiaFWQEan1+jf7qOMMeF6/HV7d0PVcBuBIMLA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6871:8a7:b0:203:ef78:15b9 with SMTP id r39-20020a05687108a700b00203ef7815b9mr29197oaq.0.1704853582257; Tue, 09 Jan 2024 18:26:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from Laptop-X1 ([43.228.180.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c32-20020a631c20000000b005c66b54476bsm2285127pgc.63.2024.01.09.18.26.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 09 Jan 2024 18:26:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 10:26:18 +0800 From: Hangbin Liu To: Jay Vosburgh Cc: Aahil Awatramani , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 net-next v2] bonding: Extending LACP MUX State Machine to include a Collecting State. Message-ID: References: <20240105000632.2484182-1-aahila@google.com> <11317.1704418732@famine> <26173.1704830028@famine> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <26173.1704830028@famine> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 11:53:48AM -0800, Jay Vosburgh wrote: > >> Please reference the standard in the description; this is > >> implementing the independent control state machine per IEEE 802.1AX-2008 > >> 5.4.15 in addition to the existing coupled control state machine. > > > >The status of IEEE 802.1AX-2008[1] is "Superseded Standard". Maybe we should > >use IEEE 802.1AX-2020[2]. > > > >[1] https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/802.1AX/4176/ > >[2] https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/802.1AX/6768/ > > I'm fine to still reference the 2008 (or 2014) standard even > though it's superseded; the 2020 standard is much more complicated, and > I find it harder to follow (particularly for the coupled / independent > control sections, the older standard explains them more clearly in my > reading). Bonding does not implement any of the new things added for > the 2020 version, so we're not really missing anything. > > That said, as long as the citations are for the correct section > (the numbering is not consistent between versions) any version is > acceptable. Got it. Thanks for the comments. Cheers Hangbin