From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: David Wei <dw@davidwei.uk>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/5] netdevsim: allow two netdevsim ports to be connected
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 11:56:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZZPr1HJ8Yt8SOi-R@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <df202c29-a9e0-4806-a30c-8d20453bf397@davidwei.uk>
Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 01:47:59AM CET, dw@davidwei.uk wrote:
>On 2023-12-20 01:09, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 02:47:44AM CET, dw@davidwei.uk wrote:
>>> Add a debugfs file in
>>> /sys/kernel/debug/netdevsim/netdevsimN/ports/A/peer
>>>
>>> Writing "M B" to this file will link port A of netdevsim N with port B
>>> of netdevsim M. Reading this file will return the linked netdevsim id
>>> and port, if any.
>>>
>>> nsim_dev_list_lock and rtnl_lock are held during read/write of peer to
>>> prevent concurrent modification of netdevsims or their ports.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Wei <dw@davidwei.uk>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>> drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c | 6 ++
>>> drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h | 1 +
>>> 3 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c b/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c
>>> index e30a12130e07..e4621861c70b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c
>>> @@ -391,6 +391,117 @@ static const struct file_operations nsim_dev_rate_parent_fops = {
>>> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>>> };
>>>
>>> +static struct nsim_dev *nsim_dev_find_by_id(unsigned int id)
>>> +{
>>> + struct nsim_dev *dev;
>>> +
>>> + list_for_each_entry(dev, &nsim_dev_list, list)
>>> + if (dev->nsim_bus_dev->dev.id == id)
>>> + return dev;
>>> +
>>> + return NULL;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static struct nsim_dev_port *
>>> +__nsim_dev_port_lookup(struct nsim_dev *nsim_dev, enum nsim_dev_port_type type,
>>> + unsigned int port_index)
>>> +{
>>> + struct nsim_dev_port *nsim_dev_port;
>>> +
>>> + port_index = nsim_dev_port_index(type, port_index);
>>> + list_for_each_entry(nsim_dev_port, &nsim_dev->port_list, list)
>>> + if (nsim_dev_port->port_index == port_index)
>>> + return nsim_dev_port;
>>> + return NULL;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static ssize_t nsim_dev_peer_read(struct file *file, char __user *data,
>>> + size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
>>> +{
>>> + struct nsim_dev_port *nsim_dev_port;
>>> + struct netdevsim *peer;
>>> + unsigned int id, port;
>>> + char buf[23];
>>> + ssize_t ret;
>>> +
>>> + mutex_lock(&nsim_dev_list_lock);
>>> + rtnl_lock();
>>> + nsim_dev_port = file->private_data;
>>> + peer = rtnl_dereference(nsim_dev_port->ns->peer);
>>> + if (!peer)
>>> + goto out;
>>> +
>>> + id = peer->nsim_bus_dev->dev.id;
>>> + port = peer->nsim_dev_port->port_index;
>>> + ret = scnprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%u %u\n", id, port);
>>> + ret = simple_read_from_buffer(data, count, ppos, buf, ret);
>>> +
>>> +out:
>>> + rtnl_unlock();
>>> + mutex_unlock(&nsim_dev_list_lock);
>>> +
>>> + return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static ssize_t nsim_dev_peer_write(struct file *file,
>>> + const char __user *data,
>>> + size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
>>> +{
>>> + struct nsim_dev_port *nsim_dev_port, *peer_dev_port;
>>> + struct nsim_dev *peer_dev;
>>> + unsigned int id, port;
>>> + char buf[22];
>>> + ssize_t ret;
>>> +
>>> + if (count >= sizeof(buf))
>>> + return -ENOSPC;
>>> +
>>> + ret = copy_from_user(buf, data, count);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + return -EFAULT;
>>> + buf[count] = '\0';
>>> +
>>> + ret = sscanf(buf, "%u %u", &id, &port);
>>> + if (ret != 2) {
>>> + pr_err("Format for adding a peer is \"id port\" (uint uint)");
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>>> + mutex_lock(&nsim_dev_list_lock);
>>> + rtnl_lock();
>>> + peer_dev = nsim_dev_find_by_id(id);
>>> + if (!peer_dev)
>>> + goto out;
>>
>> Tell the user what's wrong please.
>
>Okay.
>
>>
>>> +
>>> + peer_dev_port = __nsim_dev_port_lookup(peer_dev, NSIM_DEV_PORT_TYPE_PF,
>>> + port);
>>> + if (!peer_dev_port)
>>> + goto out;
>>
>> Tell the user what's wrong please.
>
>Ditto.
>
>>
>>
>>> +
>>> + nsim_dev_port = file->private_data;
>>> + if (nsim_dev_port == peer_dev_port)
>>
>> Why fail here? IDK, success sounds better to me.
>
>I don't want to link a port to itself. In my mental model a port is e.g.
>a port on a switch. It doesn't make sense to connect it to itself.
Okay, I misread.
>
>>
>>
>>> + goto out;
>>> +
>>> + rcu_assign_pointer(nsim_dev_port->ns->peer, peer_dev_port->ns);
>>> + rcu_assign_pointer(peer_dev_port->ns->peer, nsim_dev_port->ns);
>>> + ret = count;
>>> +
>>> +out:
>>> + rtnl_unlock();
>>> + mutex_unlock(&nsim_dev_list_lock);
>>> +
>>> + return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static const struct file_operations nsim_dev_peer_fops = {
>>> + .open = simple_open,
>>> + .read = nsim_dev_peer_read,
>>> + .write = nsim_dev_peer_write,
>>> + .llseek = generic_file_llseek,
>>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> static int nsim_dev_port_debugfs_init(struct nsim_dev *nsim_dev,
>>> struct nsim_dev_port *nsim_dev_port)
>>> {
>>> @@ -421,6 +532,9 @@ static int nsim_dev_port_debugfs_init(struct nsim_dev *nsim_dev,
>>> }
>>> debugfs_create_symlink("dev", nsim_dev_port->ddir, dev_link_name);
>>>
>>> + debugfs_create_file("peer", 0600, nsim_dev_port->ddir,
>>> + nsim_dev_port, &nsim_dev_peer_fops);
>>> +
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -1702,19 +1816,6 @@ void nsim_drv_remove(struct nsim_bus_dev *nsim_bus_dev)
>>> dev_set_drvdata(&nsim_bus_dev->dev, NULL);
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static struct nsim_dev_port *
>>> -__nsim_dev_port_lookup(struct nsim_dev *nsim_dev, enum nsim_dev_port_type type,
>>> - unsigned int port_index)
>>> -{
>>> - struct nsim_dev_port *nsim_dev_port;
>>> -
>>> - port_index = nsim_dev_port_index(type, port_index);
>>> - list_for_each_entry(nsim_dev_port, &nsim_dev->port_list, list)
>>> - if (nsim_dev_port->port_index == port_index)
>>> - return nsim_dev_port;
>>> - return NULL;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> int nsim_drv_port_add(struct nsim_bus_dev *nsim_bus_dev, enum nsim_dev_port_type type,
>>> unsigned int port_index)
>>> {
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c b/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c
>>> index aecaf5f44374..434322f6a565 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c
>>> @@ -388,6 +388,7 @@ nsim_create(struct nsim_dev *nsim_dev, struct nsim_dev_port *nsim_dev_port)
>>> ns->nsim_dev = nsim_dev;
>>> ns->nsim_dev_port = nsim_dev_port;
>>> ns->nsim_bus_dev = nsim_dev->nsim_bus_dev;
>>> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(ns->peer, NULL);
>>> SET_NETDEV_DEV(dev, &ns->nsim_bus_dev->dev);
>>> SET_NETDEV_DEVLINK_PORT(dev, &nsim_dev_port->devlink_port);
>>> nsim_ethtool_init(ns);
>>> @@ -407,8 +408,13 @@ nsim_create(struct nsim_dev *nsim_dev, struct nsim_dev_port *nsim_dev_port)
>>> void nsim_destroy(struct netdevsim *ns)
>>> {
>>> struct net_device *dev = ns->netdev;
>>> + struct netdevsim *peer;
>>>
>>> rtnl_lock();
>>> + peer = rtnl_dereference(ns->peer);
>>> + if (peer)
>>> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(peer->peer, NULL);
>>> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(ns->peer, NULL);
>>> unregister_netdevice(dev);
>>> if (nsim_dev_port_is_pf(ns->nsim_dev_port)) {
>>> nsim_macsec_teardown(ns);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h b/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h
>>> index babb61d7790b..24fc3fbda791 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h
>>> @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ struct netdevsim {
>>> } udp_ports;
>>>
>>> struct nsim_ethtool ethtool;
>>> + struct netdevsim __rcu *peer;
>>> };
>>>
>>> struct netdevsim *
>>> --
>>> 2.39.3
>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-02 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-20 1:47 [PATCH net-next v4 0/5] netdevsim: link and forward skbs between ports David Wei
2023-12-20 1:47 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/5] netdevsim: maintain a list of probed netdevsims David Wei
2023-12-20 8:57 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-12-22 0:45 ` David Wei
2023-12-22 4:54 ` David Wei
2024-01-02 10:55 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-01-02 11:01 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-12-20 16:40 ` Simon Horman
2023-12-22 0:49 ` David Wei
2023-12-20 1:47 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/5] netdevsim: allow two netdevsim ports to be connected David Wei
2023-12-20 9:09 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-12-22 0:47 ` David Wei
2024-01-02 10:56 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2023-12-20 12:58 ` kernel test robot
2023-12-20 1:47 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/5] netdevsim: forward skbs from one connected port to another David Wei
2023-12-20 9:04 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-12-22 0:58 ` David Wei
2023-12-20 1:47 ` [PATCH net-next v4 4/5] netdevsim: add selftest for forwarding skb between connected ports David Wei
2023-12-20 1:47 ` [PATCH net-next v4 5/5] netdevsim: add Makefile for selftests David Wei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZZPr1HJ8Yt8SOi-R@nanopsycho \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dw@davidwei.uk \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox