From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@linux.dev>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, andrew@lunn.ch, olteanv@gmail.com,
hkallweit1@gmail.com, kabel@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: Cleanup struct mdio_driver_common
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 10:51:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZZU8I5wwH+y1VsIy@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a5aca886-ca0a-8170-417f-a189ec28c87f@linux.dev>
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 10:03:14AM +0800, Yajun Deng wrote:
>
> On 2024/1/3 01:34, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > I'm not sure why this consistency is even desired, the commit message
> > doesn't properly say _why_ this change is being proposed.
>
> Most drivers use device_driver directly. This should be added to the commit.
>
> Like this:
>
> struct sdio_driver {
>
> ... ...
>
> struct device_driver drv;
> };
>
>
> struct pcie_port_service_driver {
>
> ... ...
>
> struct device_driver driver;
> };
>
> and so on ...
... which is fine for those other drivers because they don't share the
same bus. That is not the case here - we have two different classes
of drivers on the same bus.
I don't like a justification that just because other subsystems do
something in one particular way, that is the only way things should be
done. I think there is good reason to have the structure we have, and
thus there needs to be a good reason to change it.
Maybe Andrew has a different opinion, but I think we need a better
justification for this change.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-03 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-28 7:23 [PATCH net-next] net: phy: Cleanup struct mdio_driver_common Yajun Deng
2023-12-28 8:24 ` Przemek Kitszel
2023-12-28 8:37 ` Yajun Deng
2024-01-02 17:34 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-01-03 2:03 ` Yajun Deng
2024-01-03 10:51 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2024-01-03 11:38 ` Yajun Deng
2024-01-03 13:30 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-01-03 18:25 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZZU8I5wwH+y1VsIy@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kabel@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=yajun.deng@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).