From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: David Wei <dw@davidwei.uk>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 3/5] netdevsim: forward skbs from one connected port to another
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 10:31:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZZZ7C0dhg2KzaNfi@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf4760df-a78f-431d-8c33-b7a2f7fb393d@davidwei.uk>
Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:36:36PM CET, dw@davidwei.uk wrote:
>On 2024-01-02 03:13, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 02:46:31AM CET, dw@davidwei.uk wrote:
>>> Forward skbs sent from one netdevsim port to its connected netdevsim
>>> port using dev_forward_skb, in a spirit similar to veth.
>>>
>>> Add a tx_dropped variable to struct netdevsim, tracking the number of
>>> skbs that could not be forwarded using dev_forward_skb().
>>>
>>> The xmit() function accessing the peer ptr is protected by an RCU read
>>> critical section. The rcu_read_lock() is functionally redundant as since
>>> v5.0 all softirqs are implicitly RCU read critical sections; but it is
>>> useful for human readers.
>>>
>>> If another CPU is concurrently in nsim_destroy(), then it will first set
>>> the peer ptr to NULL. This does not affect any existing readers that
>>> dereferenced a non-NULL peer. Then, in unregister_netdevice(), there is
>>> a synchronize_rcu() before the netdev is actually unregistered and
>>> freed. This ensures that any readers i.e. xmit() that got a non-NULL
>>> peer will complete before the netdev is freed.
>>>
>>> Any readers after the RCU_INIT_POINTER() but before synchronize_rcu()
>>> will dereference NULL, making it safe.
>>>
>>> The codepath to nsim_destroy() and nsim_create() takes both the newly
>>> added nsim_dev_list_lock and rtnl_lock. This makes it safe with
>>
>> I don't see the rtnl_lock take in those functions.
>>
>>
>> Otherwise, this patch looks fine to me.
>
>For nsim_create(), rtnl_lock is taken in nsim_init_netdevsim(). For
>nsim_destroy(), rtnl_lock is taken directly in the function.
>
>What I mean here is, in the netdevsim device modification paths locks
>are taken in this order:
>
>devl_lock -> rtnl_lock
>
>nsim_dev_list_lock is taken outside (not nested) of these.
>
>In nsim_dev_peer_write() where two ports are linked, locks are taken in
>this order:
>
>nsim_dev_list_lock -> devl_lock -> rtnl_lock
>
>This will not cause deadlocks and ensures that two ports being linked
>are both valid.
Okay. Perhaps would be good to document this in a comment somewhere in
the code?
>
>>
>>
>>> concurrent calls to linking two netdevsims together.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Wei <dw@davidwei.uk>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
>>> drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h | 1 +
>>> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c b/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c
>>> index 434322f6a565..0009d0f1243f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c
>>> @@ -29,19 +29,34 @@
>>> static netdev_tx_t nsim_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>>> {
>>> struct netdevsim *ns = netdev_priv(dev);
>>> + struct netdevsim *peer_ns;
>>> + int ret = NETDEV_TX_OK;
>>>
>>> if (!nsim_ipsec_tx(ns, skb))
>>> goto out;
>>>
>>> + rcu_read_lock();
>>> + peer_ns = rcu_dereference(ns->peer);
>>> + if (!peer_ns)
>>> + goto out_stats;
>>> +
>>> + skb_tx_timestamp(skb);
>>> + if (unlikely(dev_forward_skb(peer_ns->netdev, skb) == NET_RX_DROP))
>>> + ret = NET_XMIT_DROP;
>>> +
>>> +out_stats:
>>> + rcu_read_unlock();
>>> u64_stats_update_begin(&ns->syncp);
>>> ns->tx_packets++;
>>> ns->tx_bytes += skb->len;
>>> + if (ret == NET_XMIT_DROP)
>>> + ns->tx_dropped++;
>>> u64_stats_update_end(&ns->syncp);
>>> + return ret;
>>>
>>> out:
>>> dev_kfree_skb(skb);
>>> -
>>> - return NETDEV_TX_OK;
>>> + return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> static void nsim_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *dev)
>>> @@ -70,6 +85,7 @@ nsim_get_stats64(struct net_device *dev, struct rtnl_link_stats64 *stats)
>>> start = u64_stats_fetch_begin(&ns->syncp);
>>> stats->tx_bytes = ns->tx_bytes;
>>> stats->tx_packets = ns->tx_packets;
>>> + stats->tx_dropped = ns->tx_dropped;
>>> } while (u64_stats_fetch_retry(&ns->syncp, start));
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -302,7 +318,6 @@ static void nsim_setup(struct net_device *dev)
>>> eth_hw_addr_random(dev);
>>>
>>> dev->tx_queue_len = 0;
>>> - dev->flags |= IFF_NOARP;
>>> dev->flags &= ~IFF_MULTICAST;
>>> dev->priv_flags |= IFF_LIVE_ADDR_CHANGE |
>>> IFF_NO_QUEUE;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h b/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h
>>> index 24fc3fbda791..083b1ee7a1a2 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdevsim.h
>>> @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ struct netdevsim {
>>>
>>> u64 tx_packets;
>>> u64 tx_bytes;
>>> + u64 tx_dropped;
>>> struct u64_stats_sync syncp;
>>>
>>> struct nsim_bus_dev *nsim_bus_dev;
>>> --
>>> 2.39.3
>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-04 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-28 1:46 [PATCH net-next v5 0/5] netdevsim: link and forward skbs between ports David Wei
2023-12-28 1:46 ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/5] netdevsim: maintain a list of probed netdevsims David Wei
2024-01-02 11:04 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-01-03 21:48 ` David Wei
2023-12-28 1:46 ` [PATCH net-next v5 2/5] netdevsim: allow two netdevsim ports to be connected David Wei
2024-01-02 11:11 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-01-03 21:56 ` David Wei
2024-01-04 9:30 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-01-04 1:39 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-01-09 16:57 ` David Wei
2024-01-10 1:53 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-12-28 1:46 ` [PATCH net-next v5 3/5] netdevsim: forward skbs from one connected port to another David Wei
2024-01-02 11:13 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-01-03 22:36 ` David Wei
2024-01-04 9:31 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2024-01-09 16:58 ` David Wei
2024-01-02 11:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-01-03 21:57 ` David Wei
2023-12-28 1:46 ` [PATCH net-next v5 4/5] netdevsim: add selftest for forwarding skb between connected ports David Wei
2023-12-28 1:46 ` [PATCH net-next v5 5/5] netdevsim: add Makefile for selftests David Wei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZZZ7C0dhg2KzaNfi@nanopsycho \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dw@davidwei.uk \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox