netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Pedro Tammela <pctammela@mojatatu.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, jhs@mojatatu.com,
	xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/sched: simplify tc_action_load_ops parameters
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 15:57:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZZbHbUsTVo7oJL2P@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240104141113.1995416-1-pctammela@mojatatu.com>

Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 03:11:13PM CET, pctammela@mojatatu.com wrote:
>Instead of using two bools derived from a flags passed as arguments to
>the parent function of tc_action_load_ops, just pass the flags itself
>to tc_action_load_ops to simplify its parameters.
>
>Signed-off-by: Pedro Tammela <pctammela@mojatatu.com>
>---
> include/net/act_api.h | 3 +--
> net/sched/act_api.c   | 9 ++++-----
> net/sched/cls_api.c   | 5 ++---
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/include/net/act_api.h b/include/net/act_api.h
>index 447985a45ef6..e1e5e72b901e 100644
>--- a/include/net/act_api.h
>+++ b/include/net/act_api.h
>@@ -208,8 +208,7 @@ int tcf_action_init(struct net *net, struct tcf_proto *tp, struct nlattr *nla,
> 		    struct nlattr *est,
> 		    struct tc_action *actions[], int init_res[], size_t *attr_size,
> 		    u32 flags, u32 fl_flags, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>-struct tc_action_ops *tc_action_load_ops(struct nlattr *nla, bool police,
>-					 bool rtnl_held,
>+struct tc_action_ops *tc_action_load_ops(struct nlattr *nla, u32 flags,
> 					 struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
> struct tc_action *tcf_action_init_1(struct net *net, struct tcf_proto *tp,
> 				    struct nlattr *nla, struct nlattr *est,
>diff --git a/net/sched/act_api.c b/net/sched/act_api.c
>index ef70d4771811..dd3b893802db 100644
>--- a/net/sched/act_api.c
>+++ b/net/sched/act_api.c
>@@ -1324,10 +1324,10 @@ void tcf_idr_insert_many(struct tc_action *actions[], int init_res[])
> 	}
> }
> 
>-struct tc_action_ops *tc_action_load_ops(struct nlattr *nla, bool police,
>-					 bool rtnl_held,
>+struct tc_action_ops *tc_action_load_ops(struct nlattr *nla, u32 flags,
> 					 struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
>+	bool police = flags & TCA_ACT_FLAGS_POLICE;
> 	struct nlattr *tb[TCA_ACT_MAX + 1];
> 	struct tc_action_ops *a_o;
> 	char act_name[IFNAMSIZ];
>@@ -1359,6 +1359,7 @@ struct tc_action_ops *tc_action_load_ops(struct nlattr *nla, bool police,
> 	a_o = tc_lookup_action_n(act_name);
> 	if (a_o == NULL) {
> #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
>+		bool rtnl_held = !(flags & TCA_ACT_FLAGS_NO_RTNL);

Empty line here please.

Otherwise this looks fine to me.
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>




> 		if (rtnl_held)
> 			rtnl_unlock();
> 		request_module("act_%s", act_name);
>@@ -1475,9 +1476,7 @@ int tcf_action_init(struct net *net, struct tcf_proto *tp, struct nlattr *nla,
> 	for (i = 1; i <= TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO && tb[i]; i++) {
> 		struct tc_action_ops *a_o;
> 
>-		a_o = tc_action_load_ops(tb[i], flags & TCA_ACT_FLAGS_POLICE,
>-					 !(flags & TCA_ACT_FLAGS_NO_RTNL),
>-					 extack);
>+		a_o = tc_action_load_ops(tb[i], flags, extack);
> 		if (IS_ERR(a_o)) {
> 			err = PTR_ERR(a_o);
> 			goto err_mod;
>diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c
>index 46c98367d205..8d25e6b561dd 100644
>--- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
>+++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
>@@ -3297,12 +3297,11 @@ int tcf_exts_validate_ex(struct net *net, struct tcf_proto *tp, struct nlattr **
> 		if (exts->police && tb[exts->police]) {
> 			struct tc_action_ops *a_o;
> 
>-			a_o = tc_action_load_ops(tb[exts->police], true,
>-						 !(flags & TCA_ACT_FLAGS_NO_RTNL),
>+			flags |= TCA_ACT_FLAGS_POLICE | TCA_ACT_FLAGS_BIND;
>+			a_o = tc_action_load_ops(tb[exts->police], flags,
> 						 extack);
> 			if (IS_ERR(a_o))
> 				return PTR_ERR(a_o);
>-			flags |= TCA_ACT_FLAGS_POLICE | TCA_ACT_FLAGS_BIND;
> 			act = tcf_action_init_1(net, tp, tb[exts->police],
> 						rate_tlv, a_o, init_res, flags,
> 						extack);
>-- 
>2.40.1
>

      reply	other threads:[~2024-01-04 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-04 14:11 [PATCH net-next] net/sched: simplify tc_action_load_ops parameters Pedro Tammela
2024-01-04 14:57 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZZbHbUsTVo7oJL2P@nanopsycho \
    --to=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pctammela@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).