From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-lf1-f52.google.com (mail-lf1-f52.google.com [209.85.167.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E25545101B; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 15:17:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-lf1-f52.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-50eaaf2c7deso1858084e87.2; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 07:17:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704727060; x=1705331860; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=+hD+83XjWM51MBXcvcVONIs4WX38iaQlxtxjozUZeF8=; b=Qxa9avzAY+bdMveQxWAfUzLv0Ph88A8vKQ61NSHkQA/rgsd02W5brzib3CB41d/EJy snWHn6MyrTs4HF/q6xxRnghqY1tMc2IDJatREwennQMIjeNUkqdZxGwvP6tkJgrbHGtX OsI40WFw469ed/b3AfrMTmnkz+//K3efp2z6HPLKUxNN8UXbjBN0BIjkDqAE0LyX7kkv OznS//v7DBQ9zEXHuIQuZJaWkJXD6tVIZ/teXPLN9sHncSsci4bzzR5NLWV9/HvUTe/m WFgm8FJYZQmll4HYzVhnscWGABKGbKfrVf0IkaejgFJUq4BsDdv/kJBJl0CbURKlbQiX pdlw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzOYQzwc/xS4ZMtjJotvY1lnIKhBJi6PxckZ7EF5qdPh5GW6Bsj lh7ZoHD/G47JuNmOMvogrnJbMSLQA0o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFlQqoTpWvtut3H4+mxdlx9PyKTqsw6HBj5lIMxXtqYXPaF1/zPZl9+ASSlBDaCP31Few51+Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:31c7:b0:50e:7de4:863f with SMTP id j7-20020a05651231c700b0050e7de4863fmr1741960lfe.86.1704727059567; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 07:17:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from gmail.com (fwdproxy-cln-120.fbsv.net. [2a03:2880:31ff:78::face:b00c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k1-20020a17090632c100b00a28fa7838a1sm4061425ejk.172.2024.01.08.07.17.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 08 Jan 2024 07:17:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 07:17:36 -0800 From: Breno Leitao To: David Ahern Cc: "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Bill Wendling , Justin Stitt , leit@meta.com, "open list:NETWORKING [IPv4/IPv6]" , open list , "open list:CLANG/LLVM BUILD SUPPORT:Keyword:b(?i:clang|llvm)b" , Wei Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/ipv6: resolve warning in ip6_fib.c Message-ID: References: <20240105173920.1041474-1-leitao@debian.org> <8ae4f9b0-1917-448d-a89b-11597549f89b@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8ae4f9b0-1917-448d-a89b-11597549f89b@kernel.org> On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 09:13:53AM -0700, David Ahern wrote: > On 1/5/24 10:39 AM, Breno Leitao wrote: > > -#if RT6_DEBUG >= 3 > > -#define RT6_TRACE(x...) pr_debug(x) > > -#else > > -#define RT6_TRACE(x...) do { ; } while (0) > > -#endif > > +#define RT6_TRACE(x...) do { if (RT6_DEBUG > 3) pr_debug(x); } while (0) > > > > struct rt6_info; > > struct fib6_info; > > I question the value of RT6_TRACE vs just using pr_debug; pr_debug has > zero cost until enabled and can be enabled by file or line. Not > requiring a kernel build is actual better. > > [cc'ed Wei who added the macro] I also questioned it. Anyway, if we don't hear any strong opinion in favor of RT6_TRACE(), I will replace it by pr_debug() in a v2.