netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
	syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
	sdf@fomichev.me, jdamato@fastly.com, almasrymina@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] netdev: fix the locking for netdev notifications
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 18:11:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_2yMjGtbQ0ehtDN@mini-arch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250414195903.574489-1-kuba@kernel.org>

On 04/14, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Kuniyuki reports that the assert for netdev lock fires when
> there are netdev event listeners (otherwise we skip the netlink
> event generation).
> 
> Correct the locking when coming from the notifier.
> 
> The NETDEV_XDP_FEAT_CHANGE notifier is already fully locked,
> it's the documentation that's incorrect.
> 
> Fixes: 99e44f39a8f7 ("netdev: depend on netdev->lock for xdp features")
> Reported-by: syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
> Reported-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250410171019.62128-1-kuniyu@amazon.com
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>

> ---
> v2:
>  - rebase vs net merge which brought in
>    commit 04efcee6ef8d ("net: hold instance lock during NETDEV_CHANGE")
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/20250411204629.128669-1-kuba@kernel.org
> 
> CC: kuniyu@amazon.com
> CC: sdf@fomichev.me
> CC: jdamato@fastly.com
> CC: almasrymina@google.com
> ---
>  Documentation/networking/netdevices.rst |  4 +++-
>  include/linux/netdevice.h               |  2 +-
>  include/net/netdev_lock.h               | 12 ++++++++++++
>  net/core/lock_debug.c                   |  4 +++-
>  net/core/netdev-genl.c                  |  4 ++++
>  5 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/networking/netdevices.rst b/Documentation/networking/netdevices.rst
> index f87bb55b4afe..a73a39b206e3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/networking/netdevices.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/networking/netdevices.rst
> @@ -387,12 +387,14 @@ For device drivers that implement shaping or queue management APIs,
>  some of the notifiers (``enum netdev_cmd``) are running under the netdev
>  instance lock.
>  
> +The following netdev notifiers are always run under the instance lock:
> +* ``NETDEV_XDP_FEAT_CHANGE``
> +
>  For devices with locked ops, currently only the following notifiers are
>  running under the lock:
>  * ``NETDEV_CHANGE``
>  * ``NETDEV_REGISTER``
>  * ``NETDEV_UP``
> -* ``NETDEV_XDP_FEAT_CHANGE``
>  
>  The following notifiers are running without the lock:
>  * ``NETDEV_UNREGISTER``
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index e6036b82ef4c..0321fd952f70 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -2520,7 +2520,7 @@ struct net_device {
>  	 *	@net_shaper_hierarchy, @reg_state, @threaded
>  	 *
>  	 * Double protects:
> -	 *	@up, @moving_ns, @nd_net, @xdp_flags
> +	 *	@up, @moving_ns, @nd_net, @xdp_features
>  	 *
>  	 * Double ops protects:
>  	 *	@real_num_rx_queues, @real_num_tx_queues
> diff --git a/include/net/netdev_lock.h b/include/net/netdev_lock.h
> index 5706835a660c..c63448b17f9e 100644
> --- a/include/net/netdev_lock.h
> +++ b/include/net/netdev_lock.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,18 @@ static inline void netdev_unlock_ops(struct net_device *dev)
>  		netdev_unlock(dev);
>  }
>  
> +static inline void netdev_lock_ops_to_full(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> +	if (!netdev_need_ops_lock(dev))
> +		netdev_lock(dev);

Optional nit: I'm getting lost in all the helpers, I'd add the following here:

else
	netdev_ops_assert_locked(dev);

Or maybe even:

if (netdev_need_ops_lock)
	netdev_ops_assert_locked
else
	netdev_lock

To express the constraints better.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-15  1:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-14 19:59 [PATCH net-next v2] netdev: fix the locking for netdev notifications Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-15  1:11 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2025-04-15 14:53   ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z_2yMjGtbQ0ehtDN@mini-arch \
    --to=stfomichev@gmail.com \
    --cc=almasrymina@google.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).