netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
To: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <jv@jvosburgh.net>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>, Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>,
	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Ayush Sawal <ayush.sawal@chelsio.com>,
	Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
	Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@marvell.com>,
	Geetha sowjanya <gakula@marvell.com>,
	Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@marvell.com>,
	hariprasad <hkelam@marvell.com>,
	Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@marvell.com>,
	Louis Peens <louis.peens@corigine.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 6/6] bonding: Fix multiple long standing offload races
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 09:09:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_jcSEqmmUma8QqF@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250411074958.2858496-7-cratiu@nvidia.com>

On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 10:49:58AM +0300, Cosmin Ratiu wrote:
> Refactor the bonding ipsec offload operations to fix a number of
> long-standing control plane races between state migration and user
> deletion and a few other issues.
> 
> xfrm state deletion can happen concurrently with
> bond_change_active_slave() operation. This manifests itself as a
> bond_ipsec_del_sa() call with x->lock held, followed by a
> bond_ipsec_free_sa() a bit later from a wq. The alternate path of
> these calls coming from xfrm_dev_state_flush() can't happen, as that
> needs the RTNL lock and bond_change_active_slave() already holds it.
> 
> 1. bond_ipsec_del_sa_all() might call xdo_dev_state_delete() a second
>    time on an xfrm state that was concurrently killed. This is bad.
> 2. bond_ipsec_add_sa_all() can add a state on the new device, but
>    pending bond_ipsec_free_sa() calls from the old device will then hit
>    the WARN_ON() and then, worse, call xdo_dev_state_free() on the new
>    device without a corresponding xdo_dev_state_delete().
> 3. Resolve a sleeping in atomic context introduced by the mentioned
>    "Fixes" commit.
> 
> bond_ipsec_del_sa_all() and bond_ipsec_add_sa_all() now acquire x->lock
> and check for x->km.state to help with problems 1 and 2. And since
> xso.real_dev is now a private pointer managed by the bonding driver in
> xfrm state, make better use of it to fully fix problems 1 and 2. In
> bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(), set xso.real_dev to NULL while holding both the
> mutex and x->lock, which makes sure that neither bond_ipsec_del_sa() nor
> bond_ipsec_free_sa() could run concurrently.
> 
> Fix problem 3 by moving the list cleanup (which requires the mutex) from
> bond_ipsec_del_sa() (called from atomic context) to bond_ipsec_free_sa()
> 
> Finally, simplify bond_ipsec_del_sa() and bond_ipsec_free_sa() by using
> xso->real_dev directly, since it's now protected by locks and can be
> trusted to always reflect the offload device.
> 
> Fixes: 2aeeef906d5a ("bonding: change ipsec_lock from spin lock to mutex")
> Signed-off-by: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 82 +++++++++++++++------------------
>  include/net/xfrm.h              |  7 ++-
>  2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index 14f7c9712ad4..8ed8c29659a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -545,7 +545,20 @@ static void bond_ipsec_add_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
>  			slave_warn(bond_dev, real_dev, "%s: failed to add SA\n", __func__);
>  			continue;
>  		}
> +
> +		spin_lock_bh(&ipsec->xs->lock);
> +		/* xs might have been killed by the user during the migration
> +		 * to the new dev, but bond_ipsec_del_sa() should have done
> +		 * nothing, as xso.real_dev is NULL.
> +		 * Delete it from the device we just added it to. The pending
> +		 * bond_ipsec_free_sa() call will do the rest of the cleanup.
> +		 */
> +		if (ipsec->xs->km.state == XFRM_STATE_DEAD &&
> +		    real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete)
> +			real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete(real_dev,
> +								    ipsec->xs);
>  		ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = real_dev;
> +		spin_unlock_bh(&ipsec->xs->lock);
>  	}
>  out:
>  	mutex_unlock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
> @@ -560,48 +573,20 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa(struct net_device *bond_dev,
>  			      struct xfrm_state *xs)
>  {
>  	struct net_device *real_dev;
> -	netdevice_tracker tracker;
> -	struct bond_ipsec *ipsec;
> -	struct bonding *bond;
> -	struct slave *slave;
>  
> -	if (!bond_dev)
> +	if (!bond_dev || !xs->xso.real_dev)
>  		return;
>  
> -	rcu_read_lock();
> -	bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
> -	slave = rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
> -	real_dev = slave ? slave->dev : NULL;
> -	netdev_hold(real_dev, &tracker, GFP_ATOMIC);
> -	rcu_read_unlock();
> -
> -	if (!slave)
> -		goto out;
> -
> -	if (!xs->xso.real_dev)
> -		goto out;
> -
> -	WARN_ON(xs->xso.real_dev != real_dev);
> +	real_dev = xs->xso.real_dev;
>  
>  	if (!real_dev->xfrmdev_ops ||
>  	    !real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete ||
>  	    netif_is_bond_master(real_dev)) {
>  		slave_warn(bond_dev, real_dev, "%s: no slave xdo_dev_state_delete\n", __func__);
> -		goto out;
> +		return;
>  	}
>  
>  	real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete(real_dev, xs);
> -out:
> -	netdev_put(real_dev, &tracker);
> -	mutex_lock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
> -	list_for_each_entry(ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
> -		if (ipsec->xs == xs) {
> -			list_del(&ipsec->list);
> -			kfree(ipsec);
> -			break;
> -		}
> -	}
> -	mutex_unlock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
>  }
>  
>  static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
> @@ -629,9 +614,15 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
>  				   __func__);
>  			continue;
>  		}
> +
> +		spin_lock_bh(&ipsec->xs->lock);
>  		ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = NULL;
> -		real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete(real_dev,
> -							    ipsec->xs);
> +		/* Don't double delete states killed by the user. */
> +		if (ipsec->xs->km.state != XFRM_STATE_DEAD)
> +			real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete(real_dev,
> +								    ipsec->xs);
> +		spin_unlock_bh(&ipsec->xs->lock);
> +
>  		if (real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free)
>  			real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(real_dev,
>  								  ipsec->xs);
> @@ -643,34 +634,33 @@ static void bond_ipsec_free_sa(struct net_device *bond_dev,
>  			       struct xfrm_state *xs)
>  {
>  	struct net_device *real_dev;
> -	netdevice_tracker tracker;
> +	struct bond_ipsec *ipsec;
>  	struct bonding *bond;
> -	struct slave *slave;
>  
>  	if (!bond_dev)
>  		return;
>  
> -	rcu_read_lock();
>  	bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
> -	slave = rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
> -	real_dev = slave ? slave->dev : NULL;
> -	netdev_hold(real_dev, &tracker, GFP_ATOMIC);
> -	rcu_read_unlock();
> -
> -	if (!slave)
> -		goto out;
>  
> +	mutex_lock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
>  	if (!xs->xso.real_dev)
>  		goto out;
>  
> -	WARN_ON(xs->xso.real_dev != real_dev);
> +	real_dev = xs->xso.real_dev;
>  
>  	xs->xso.real_dev = NULL;
> -	if (real_dev && real_dev->xfrmdev_ops &&
> +	if (real_dev->xfrmdev_ops &&
>  	    real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free)
>  		real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(real_dev, xs);
>  out:
> -	netdev_put(real_dev, &tracker);
> +	list_for_each_entry(ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
> +		if (ipsec->xs == xs) {
> +			list_del(&ipsec->list);
> +			kfree(ipsec);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> diff --git a/include/net/xfrm.h b/include/net/xfrm.h
> index 3d2f6c879311..b7e8f3f49627 100644
> --- a/include/net/xfrm.h
> +++ b/include/net/xfrm.h
> @@ -154,8 +154,11 @@ struct xfrm_dev_offload {
>  	 */
>  	struct net_device	*dev;
>  	netdevice_tracker	dev_tracker;
> -	/* This is a private pointer used by the bonding driver.
> -	 * Device drivers should not use it.
> +	/* This is a private pointer used by the bonding driver (and eventually
> +	 * should be moved there). Device drivers should not use it.
> +	 * Protected by xfrm_state.lock AND bond.ipsec_lock in most cases,
> +	 * except in the .xdo_dev_state_del() flow, where only xfrm_state.lock
> +	 * is held.
>  	 */
>  	struct net_device	*real_dev;
>  	unsigned long		offload_handle;
> -- 
> 2.45.0
> 

Tested-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-11  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-11  7:49 [PATCH net-next v3 0/6] xfrm & bonding: Correct use of xso.real_dev Cosmin Ratiu
2025-04-11  7:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/6] net/mlx5: Avoid using xso.real_dev unnecessarily Cosmin Ratiu
2025-04-11  7:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/6] xfrm: Use xdo.dev instead of xdo.real_dev Cosmin Ratiu
2025-04-11  7:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/6] xfrm: Remove unneeded device check from validate_xmit_xfrm Cosmin Ratiu
2025-04-11  7:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/6] xfrm: Add explicit dev to .xdo_dev_state_{add,delete,free} Cosmin Ratiu
2025-04-11  7:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 5/6] bonding: Mark active offloaded xfrm_states Cosmin Ratiu
2025-04-11  9:08   ` Hangbin Liu
2025-04-11  7:49 ` [PATCH net-next v3 6/6] bonding: Fix multiple long standing offload races Cosmin Ratiu
2025-04-11  9:09   ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2025-04-11  8:21 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/6] xfrm & bonding: Correct use of xso.real_dev Nikolay Aleksandrov
2025-04-14 10:11 ` Steffen Klassert
2025-04-14 16:51   ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-16  9:05     ` Steffen Klassert
2025-04-17  8:57 ` Steffen Klassert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z_jcSEqmmUma8QqF@fedora \
    --to=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=ayush.sawal@chelsio.com \
    --cc=bbhushan2@marvell.com \
    --cc=cratiu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gakula@marvell.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=hkelam@marvell.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jianbol@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=louis.peens@corigine.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    --cc=razor@blackwall.org \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=sbhatta@marvell.com \
    --cc=sgoutham@marvell.com \
    --cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).