From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com, saeedm@nvidia.com,
leon@kernel.org, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com,
anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, rrameshbabu@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 0/3] dpll: expose lock status error value to user
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 12:56:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZbjkBhAQLf4UZcGb@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b213297b-53f6-4c66-8c0b-5b3fbafdbccd@linux.dev>
Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 11:28:56AM CET, vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev wrote:
>On 29/01/2024 14:59, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
>>
>> Allow to expose lock status errort value over new DPLL generic netlink
>> attribute. Extend the lock_status_get() op by new argument to get the
>> value from the driver. Implement this new argument fill-up
>> in mlx5 driver.
>
>The list of errors shows that the focus is on SyncE devices here. What
>do you think about extending it to PPS devices too? Like loss of input
>frequency, or high phase offset?
Sure, lets add it if that suits you. There is certainly room for
extensions of values here :)
>
>But the series overall looks good,
>
>Acked-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
>
>
>> Jiri Pirko (3):
>> dpll: extend uapi by lock status error attribute
>> dpll: extend lock_status_get() op by status error and expose to user
>> net/mlx5: DPLL, Implement lock status error value
>>
>> Documentation/netlink/specs/dpll.yaml | 39 +++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c | 9 ++++-
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dpll.c | 1 +
>> .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/dpll.c | 32 +++++++++++++--
>> drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c | 9 +++--
>> include/linux/dpll.h | 1 +
>> include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h | 8 ++++
>> include/uapi/linux/dpll.h | 30 ++++++++++++++
>> 8 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-30 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-29 14:59 [patch net-next 0/3] dpll: expose lock status error value to user Jiri Pirko
2024-01-29 14:59 ` [patch net-next 1/3] dpll: extend uapi by lock status error attribute Jiri Pirko
2024-01-29 14:59 ` [patch net-next 2/3] dpll: extend lock_status_get() op by status error and expose to user Jiri Pirko
2024-01-30 10:46 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-29 14:59 ` [patch net-next 3/3] net/mlx5: DPLL, Implement lock status error value Jiri Pirko
2024-01-30 10:28 ` [patch net-next 0/3] dpll: expose lock status error value to user Vadim Fedorenko
2024-01-30 11:56 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZbjkBhAQLf4UZcGb@nanopsycho \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rrameshbabu@nvidia.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox