From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FDC981ABF; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 16:21:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=66.111.4.29 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707409297; cv=none; b=oFr0enjwwLSSAJlHuhdNMKCZFnYflKZuNhSa05l84ec5qbFGAVpFUnfUFyzFj4JRRbiQmk+Ioi1of1IHLqA9oNZ07EXvqulZnGGI2DN24aHDmvOeHAg3kMknnzzEPleRoXLVp1aEzMayrpcy5z+SpzfzPgf1hrSqPcZ1KqQSzBQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707409297; c=relaxed/simple; bh=13stO1tT1lQFQjJ06BTUULRPTA7BEpx1JRFoOnV9bUw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KHmuWqJZW+BJGmgrXjqOaXMx1iWsamegevlaDQmt+vGqeOqeD9XKx62AuSQGQs6qbs2g9oXRTQ4KDos/NAxkClUZ3BUzp4Jr8C1SuvvS+iHXWQRTgGGIU+fGdJRJD/1q1UE70f49wrqnVc9CvroNQs4U5pnQSSUSH7RkImHjdmg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=idosch.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=idosch.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=NyfTss4Y; arc=none smtp.client-ip=66.111.4.29 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=idosch.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=idosch.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="NyfTss4Y" Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.48]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20D385C00BE; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 11:21:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 08 Feb 2024 11:21:35 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; t=1707409295; x=1707495695; bh=U4hCbHFKfdC6uS3nIwXToZoziuxN 4tX7Cz0LIy8vu20=; b=NyfTss4YRGw6cbWC/rJg6+DJWytl4PdzVu0a0GC5kkxo 2B4RZ1rXTdX80a5ny/t23z2hOxCDaTVhgoSy+sTxXJMiMx+FqnZ8b7DX0cb1xjY2 6QJx7BOG8OUqCOeUOskgjmvhMHBmVv75Ct+vZ4LMXMfmC0Wc983GQ1SFpCM4HOmB DqU2D7WjU+7BL5kCK+NhFERlpsO1zGrl1Afm20H0eYLewmPa4bqukRRfbYXeGBkn 0iN6wIThSiHCNuIs2+KcmdBs1lMdnEgve87HlMQtjWZ6yJWmeNfDRoWsR7Cw+80K i9UqvMyFz2xqWUUglt3W4dsiobTrPd3yHPsVzth6Xg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrtdeggdekgecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesthdtre dttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepkfguohcuufgthhhimhhmvghluceoihguohhstghhsehiugho shgthhdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepieehffeivddtheejjeffkefftdeihe eujeevgfetieeugeekleelfefgleetudeinecuffhomhgrihhnpehlihhnuhigrdguvghv necuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepihguoh hstghhsehiughoshgthhdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i494840e7:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 11:21:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 18:21:29 +0200 From: Ido Schimmel To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev-driver-reviewers@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [TEST] bridge tests (was: net-next is OPEN) Message-ID: References: <20240129070057.62d3f18d@kernel.org> <20240129091810.0af6b81a@kernel.org> <20240131080137.50870aa4@kernel.org> <20240201073025.04cc760f@kernel.org> <20240201161619.0d248e4e@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240201161619.0d248e4e@kernel.org> On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 04:16:19PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 07:30:25 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 15:46:23 +0200 Ido Schimmel wrote: > > > > selftests-net/test-bridge-neigh-suppress-sh > > > > - fails across all, so must be the OS rather than the "speed" > > > > > > Yes, it's something related to the OS. From the log below: > > > > > > ``` > > > COMMAND: ip netns exec h1-n8Aaip ndisc6 -q -r 1 -s 2001:db8:1::1 -w 5000 2001:db8:1::2 eth0.10 > > > Raw IPv6 socket: Operation not permitted > > > TEST: ndisc6 [FAIL] > > > rc=1, expected 0 > > > ``` > > > > > > The test is supposed to be run as root so I'm not sure what this error > > > is about. Do you have something like AppArmor or SELinux running? The > > > program creates an IPv6 raw socket and requires CAP_NET_RAW. > > > > Ah, ugh, sorry for the misdirection, you're right. > > Confirmed, with the SUID cleared test-bridge-neigh-suppress-sh now > passes on everything with the exception of metal+debug kernel. I'm sorry for bothering you with this, but I checked today's logs and it seems there is a similar problem with arping: https://netdev-3.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-net-dbg/results/456561/8-test-bridge-neigh-suppress-sh/stdout https://netdev-3.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-net/results/456562/6-test-bridge-neigh-suppress-sh/stdout And according to this log the ndisc6 problem resurfaced: https://netdev-3.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-net/results/456382/6-test-bridge-neigh-suppress-sh/stdout Any chance that something in the OS changed since last week?