Re: [iwl-next v1 06/15] ice: add subfunction aux driver support

[Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com>]

On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 09:57:12AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 08:27:15AM CET, michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com wrote:
> >From: Piotr Raczynski <piotr.raczynski@intel.com>
> >
> >Instead of only registering devlink port by the ice driver itself,
> >let PF driver only register port representor for a given subfunction.
> >Then, aux driver is supposed to register its own devlink instance and
> >register virtual devlink port.
> >
> >Reviewed-by: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@intel.com>
> >Signed-off-by: Piotr Raczynski <piotr.raczynski@intel.com>
> >Signed-off-by: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com>
> >---
> > .../intel/ice/devlink/ice_devlink_port.c      |  52 ++++-
> > .../intel/ice/devlink/ice_devlink_port.h      |   6 +
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.c  |  28 ++-
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.h  |   3 +
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c     |   9 +
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_sf_eth.c   | 214 ++++++++++++++++--
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_sf_eth.h   |  21 ++
> > 7 files changed, 302 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 
> Could you please split this. I see that you can push out 1-3 patches as
> preparation.

Do you mean 1-3 patchses from this patch, or from whole patchset? I mean,
do you want to split the patchset to two patchsets? (by splitting patch
from the patchset I will have more than netdev maximum; 15 I think). 

Thanks,
Michal