From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Pieter Jansen van Vuuren <pieter.jansen-van-vuuren@amd.com>,
Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@amd.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Puneet Gupta <puneet.gupta@amd.com>,
Abhijit Gangurde <abhijit.gangurde@amd.com>,
Umang Jain <umang.jain@ideasonboard.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next RFC PATCH 1/6] net: phy: add support for defining multiple PHY IDs in PHY driver
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 19:33:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZdJbciylnw8+ve8V@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240218190034.15447-2-ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 08:00:27PM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:
> Some PHY driver might implement the same OPs for different PHY ID and
> using a mask is not enough to match similar PHYs.
>
> To reduce code duplication, add support for defining multiple PHY IDs in
> PHY driver struct.
>
> Introduce a new variable in phy_driver struct, .ids, where a table array of
> mdio_device_id can be defined to reference multiple PHY IDs (with their
> own masks) supporting the same group of OPs and flags.
>
> Introduce a new variable in phy_device, .dev_id, where the matching
> mdio_device_id is stored. PHYs supporting multiple PHYs for one PHY
> driver struct, should use this instead of matching for phy_id.
>
> Single PHY ID implementation is still supported and dev_id is filled
> with the data from phy_driver in this case.
This looks like it's been reworked somewhat with my suggestion, or maybe
we just came across a similar structure for comparing the IDs?
> + phy_dev_id = (struct mdio_device_id *)&phydev->dev_id;
Why this cast? Try to write code that doesn't need casts.
> + /* Fill the mdio_device_id for the PHY istance.
> + * If PHY driver provide an array of PHYs, search the right one,
> + * in the other case fill it with the phy_driver data.
> + */
> + if (phy_driver_match(phydrv, phydev, &dev_id) && dev_id) {
> + memcpy(phy_dev_id, dev_id, sizeof(*dev_id));
> + } else {
> + phy_dev_id->phy_id = phydrv->phy_id;
> + phy_dev_id->phy_id_mask = phydrv->phy_id_mask;
So this is the _driver_ phy_id.
> static inline bool phydev_id_compare(struct phy_device *phydev, u32 id)
> {
> - return phy_id_compare(id, phydev->phy_id, phydev->drv->phy_id_mask);
> + return phy_id_compare(id, phydev->dev_id.phy_id,
> + phydev->dev_id.phy_id_mask);
And thus this code is now different (since it _was_ comparing the
phydev phy_id, and you've changed it to effectively the driver's
phy_id. While that should be the same for a matched driver, that
is still a change that probably is't intentional.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-18 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-18 19:00 [net-next RFC PATCH 0/6] net: phy: support multi PHY in phy_driver Was: net: phy: detach PHY driver OPs from phy_driver struct Christian Marangi
2024-02-18 19:00 ` [net-next RFC PATCH 1/6] net: phy: add support for defining multiple PHY IDs in PHY driver Christian Marangi
2024-02-18 19:33 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2024-02-18 19:57 ` Christian Marangi
2024-02-18 20:10 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-02-18 20:27 ` Christian Marangi
2024-02-18 20:34 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-02-18 20:44 ` Christian Marangi
2024-02-18 21:06 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-02-18 22:07 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-02-18 19:00 ` [net-next RFC PATCH 2/6] net: phy: fill phy_id with C45 PHY Christian Marangi
2024-02-18 19:35 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-02-18 19:59 ` Christian Marangi
2024-02-18 19:00 ` [net-next RFC PATCH 3/6] mod_devicetable: permit to define a name for an mdio_device_id Christian Marangi
2024-02-18 19:00 ` [net-next RFC PATCH 4/6] net: phy: support named mdio_device_id PHY IDs Christian Marangi
2024-02-18 19:00 ` [net-next RFC PATCH 5/6] net: phy: aquantia: group common OPs for PHYs where possible Christian Marangi
2024-02-18 19:00 ` [net-next RFC PATCH 6/6] net: phy: bcm7xxx: rework phy_driver table to new multiple PHY ID format Christian Marangi
2024-02-19 4:26 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-02-19 16:41 ` Christian Marangi
2024-02-19 20:15 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-02-19 22:00 ` Christian Marangi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZdJbciylnw8+ve8V@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=abhijit.gangurde@amd.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nipun.gupta@amd.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pieter.jansen-van-vuuren@amd.com \
--cc=puneet.gupta@amd.com \
--cc=robimarko@gmail.com \
--cc=umang.jain@ideasonboard.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).