netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/core/dev.c: enable timestamp static key if CPU isolation is configured
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 14:52:11 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZdeJyxiTSKtkpHMO@tpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <65d7640c7983b_2bd671294c3@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 10:11:08AM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > For systems that use CPU isolation (via nohz_full), creating or destroying
> > a socket with  timestamping (SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW) might cause a
> > static key to be enabled/disabled. This in turn causes undesired 
> > IPIs to isolated CPUs.
> 
> This refers to SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE, not SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW.
> See also sock_set_timestamping.

Willem,

This test program does trigger the static key change:

int main (void)
{
        int option = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW;
        int sock_fd;
        int ret;
        int pid_fd;
        pid_t pid;
        char buf[50];

...

        /* set the timestamping option
         * this is to trigger the IPIs that notify all cpus of the change
         */
        if (setsockopt(sock_fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_TIMESTAMP, &option, sizeof (option)) < 0) {
                printf("Could not enable timestamping option %x", (unsigned int)option);
                close(sock_fd);
                return 0;
        }
...


  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-22 18:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-20 10:35 [PATCH] net/core/dev.c: enable timestamp static key if CPU isolation is configured Marcelo Tosatti
2024-02-22  9:34 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-02-22 15:11 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-02-22 17:52   ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2024-02-22 18:42     ` Willem de Bruijn
     [not found] <Zc9493j46rZMRIDv@tpad>
2024-02-16 15:13 ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZdeJyxiTSKtkpHMO@tpad \
    --to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).