From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-lf1-f48.google.com (mail-lf1-f48.google.com [209.85.167.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C318012E43 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 07:17:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.167.48 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708672624; cv=none; b=QsEYVI2CAxo+5AWI52BVT3ug2YTo43I+AtHqM1YsyO5Bklwhz6qwNe/2E1Vdo0FGHEKJvIZqxMeAmdCTh/2f1MbjaSob0ryGSpPk+AOsGrT2Bu83xldhrpOMFHfQ2LAq691/HIH/SU34J2WW3/C62b/LQB+muJmEVx8Z49GgIR8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708672624; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Bkd4bk603ROeoJn1sFO0ku4zKRH5VcynJHfRMn7obwQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=utnlLtEnwMfagr7XO4ZCW8TEqOHYbThfB/36V5BpqVuuqKnNv3GMp5jTc841rzkP+Q8F050l0wTHxTxYVGFmy5AttyLDdX04MKAhZngnxZi1St0knSH1O/ebzcZIfsh1KDVOMHDcE4RmHqPMtOwv5+dHA0qZJUT3ErQOjGiLuME= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=resnulli.us; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=resnulli.us; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b=Vo0aHmpZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.167.48 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=resnulli.us Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=resnulli.us Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="Vo0aHmpZ" Received: by mail-lf1-f48.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-512e39226efso853982e87.0 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 23:17:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1708672620; x=1709277420; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Bkd4bk603ROeoJn1sFO0ku4zKRH5VcynJHfRMn7obwQ=; b=Vo0aHmpZj4XJmOsmZyH/9hWcyg3zvnixs+nOlbzOvxlzwhHG8pBKL4XAbtSSwMqaS/ Ka5Bsf/daNAz0oWhObzD8GB8Loa85QjMXQ0gUhYFRYYN8LZr269A8euDSmh4pw/5Dchv g4gmCNIzz2S1W3ABGY6HKifOOgpl6KpRUs+dXcJBeHewv3U2mSuYBDXBxQc+s27JNclb kj+m1120NcIO6zrAtQOvbiEh/dfH6nzdPnRgou9zeYTRQu+Txhoiq0Dfp5jq+Cf78zZC K48CS9pDU5cJr/cwabyGxzgkdTxC9z5bhvi7oVw/OcliJ4SmNOOqL3tO9au5lvz/NzTh D0Nw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708672620; x=1709277420; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Bkd4bk603ROeoJn1sFO0ku4zKRH5VcynJHfRMn7obwQ=; b=eHGOZbNUT9H366ktD87uhUm/LyYa4TYwXSEyEtZBLvRBAO0A9FzykC/BzvPXcsHPXE lqVfAmtCjWIrh7P/1iOLG3Kg+8wQpNouz1o1zIsMVsw5lGR9Q3L7T89WhpD1XYuS4Hy2 a93kGfMCo6qcVcyEcW/lrfe7hrrdxDdlOgXxGqcpVUH65twiUspibwUVgu08GSbc8aY0 XnpU1iQNkuZQN84O1nCIQ4R9BVlAWx6aI7Jkjm90QhTvLTdmnkvARozwZXwWiRgTPpMs pJCz1EjISboF/xkfJvnSbK5FBIdqAz710iRgeStj2ZrTAWQUZM1UkNUOSZKurqWuluSN ifmQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUuv1I4qMUR85dprQSGRWVGSvkMx7Unso1mVje7j90EX6sBDmBVdVB4d5Z+CLsnQEqtLx/IwuMO7b0OhQgLkLcqORyf3naX X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxvzGiKmU9q55im8gg1B7ZqHRkUDa1/IPq/fwwSdhWQP1BqSn1J z+rSULJpMqp4uDlMfdc2yN5zNp8GQP1hWXe19eRNtOWDN/nPAGFs5JmLZN3qcVg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHcRxHrXIO6oeXHReDoO70Mrm7ktE2Yt8oIRngXxyoGs3oskpHQj7eVseptHDG6vYtIksWckw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3b2:b0:512:eb6a:5228 with SMTP id v18-20020a05651203b200b00512eb6a5228mr147878lfp.41.1708672619685; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 23:16:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([193.47.165.251]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b20-20020a0565120b9400b005116f7d1873sm2330459lfv.301.2024.02.22.23.16.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 22 Feb 2024 23:16:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 08:16:56 +0100 From: Jiri Pirko To: Eric Dumazet Cc: "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Ido Schimmel , Jiri Pirko , eric.dumazet@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 03/14] ipv6: prepare inet6_fill_ifinfo() for RCU protection Message-ID: References: <20240222105021.1943116-1-edumazet@google.com> <20240222105021.1943116-4-edumazet@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 05:45:20PM CET, edumazet@google.com wrote: >On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 5:36 PM Jiri Pirko wrote: >> >> Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 11:50:10AM CET, edumazet@google.com wrote: >> >We want to use RCU protection instead of RTNL >> >> Is this a royal "We"? :) > >I was hoping reducing RTNL pressure was a team effort. Yeah sure, it just reads odd to me, that's it. Basically if you state the motivation in the cover letter, then in the patches you just tell the codebase what to do and this "we want" statement become redundant. > >If not, maybe I should consider doing something else, if hundreds of >kernel engineers are adding more and more stuff depending on RTNL.