Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] nfp: update devlink device info output

[Louis Peens <louis.peens@corigine.com>]

On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 08:34:58PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 09:51:38 +0200 Louis Peens wrote:
> > +   * - ``part_number``
> > +     - fixed
> > +     - Part number of the entire product
> 
> Belongs in the previous patch..
> 
> >     * - ``fw.bundle_id``
> >       - stored, running
> >       - Firmware bundle id
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_devlink.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_devlink.c
> > index 635d33c0d6d3..5b41338d55c4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_devlink.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_devlink.c
> > @@ -159,7 +159,8 @@ static const struct nfp_devlink_versions_simple {
> >  	{ DEVLINK_INFO_VERSION_GENERIC_BOARD_ID,	"assembly.partno", },
> >  	{ DEVLINK_INFO_VERSION_GENERIC_BOARD_REV,	"assembly.revision", },
> >  	{ DEVLINK_INFO_VERSION_GENERIC_BOARD_MANUFACTURE, "assembly.vendor", },
> > -	{ "board.model", /* code name */		"assembly.model", },
> > +	{ DEVLINK_INFO_VERSION_GENERIC_BOARD_MODEL,	"assembly.model", },
> 
> Ah, it is the code name. I don't understand why you're trying to make
> this generic. I never seen other vendors report code names for boards.
> 
Mostly expanded on this in my previous reply of patch 1, but yes, I
agree. Should have pushed back on review of V1 where moving it to
VERSION_GENERIC was suggested. The one alternative is to still make it
generic, but give it a better name to make it clear that it is a
codename. Still, I don't know if that is generally helpful, happy to
keep it driver only.