From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from taslin.fdn.fr (taslin.fdn.fr [80.67.169.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B97F6997E for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 08:22:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.67.169.77 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710231736; cv=none; b=roZ09vUuWq7HXCtSrmfu+Ahcxmu28IRQmsnGTeDNtO0QNAFnaxV/2nRG7+OqbWmWfokU5x6ZaXlUubQeEiMx0EWmSGGxFyRpy5nEcTZ2sXo9DZDVbEXiwbp/cMt8K/IjRupUZUvkAWX30ceAad793aGSfMFw9k8hoFpb8jOo73A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710231736; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ocnfBw9s9NdEsh0cXrfgz6rAXjlFH8k5MagF3W7Gizs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=a8ozzLF7apB/YbWlMi5ZC43B/lbUQNgo8D0Ssc0T69d/+1EiEen+Q6Ks90pa6GydDR12roZ+o572ZwFb2ZODTjP3t3Bd+AT1y2IEIbl3f9DBqSEy4KjmeKnYNtwFaYc4pSR7OwNgNGXrCwkVqHa99w3I8OPPrJfFlCCNGM8Tn0w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=max.gautier.name; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=max.gautier.name; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=max.gautier.name header.i=@max.gautier.name header.b=uDQct1sW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.67.169.77 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=max.gautier.name Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=max.gautier.name Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=max.gautier.name header.i=@max.gautier.name header.b="uDQct1sW" Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2001:910:10ee:0:6a9a:1db7:4d8d:d1a9]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by taslin.fdn.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C22396023D; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:22:10 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=max.gautier.name; s=fdn; t=1710231730; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=r6eXsFxLFxfdVKvdFRJhhqA9qgh76+a5sExwyl+fWhs=; b=uDQct1sW4BOHQrZ5FKkZfezcEOF+dieBHM1ESX354tMKTX/X+KHC/qFaMAGOa8DeMs6/VS /xBh57zJLCMwT45fFetgqfE9utwu5TCM8726u3+fJP2HgkA7g0xizRGXo4u0am2Q5eb/om vCNtLs0NZtTTHj6YS/K3nKFuNPidvSSOUXZ8LMdoCRkmarjIYiUGYicXaJrT4iClxaBCyb 7QQWrlwOIjwoHnUtEkMDBOUnRl9qZkGbKmaRI+LNqM0e1nr0id6SbCna1sGoHWgxrwKeD3 bLZs+NgkS7tCazbBt5TvHCLLJngE8PuQbZ5pRoAurW+TmWffY87mvDel12gDuw== Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 09:22:20 +0100 From: Max Gautier To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next] Makefile: use systemd-tmpfiles to create /var/lib/arpd Message-ID: References: <20240311165803.62431-1-mg@max.gautier.name> <20240311124003.583053a6@hermes.local> <20240311183007.4a119eeb@hermes.local> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240311183007.4a119eeb@hermes.local> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 06:30:07PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 23:28:31 +0100 > Max Gautier wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 12:40:03PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 17:57:27 +0100 > > > Max Gautier wrote: > > > > > > > Only apply on systemd systems (detected in the configure script). > > > > The motivation is to build distributions packages without /var to go > > > > towards stateless systems, see link below (TL;DR: provisionning anything > > > > outside of /usr on boot). > > > > > > > > The feature flag can be overridden on make invocation: > > > > `make USE_TMPFILES_D=n DESTDIR= install` > > > > > > > > Links: https://0pointer.net/blog/projects/stateless.html > > > > > > Why does arpd need such hand holding, it is rarely used, maybe should just not be built. > > > > The commit introducing the install of that directory is quite old > > The problem is that build environment != runtime environment for embedded systems. That's the same for anything detected by the configure script, right ? Hence the override capability. > But arpd really is legacy/dead/rotting code at this point. Yeah I can see that, not touched since 2016 (mostly). You would rather just drop it ? -- Max Gautier