Re: [PATCH net] r8169: fix LED-related deadlock on module removal

[Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>]

On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 04:41:13PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 10:49:11 +0200 Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > >  struct rtl8169_private;
> > > +struct r8169_led_classdev;  
> > 
> > Normally these forward declarations are not needed if you're just
> > referencing the struct name in a pointer.  Usage of the struct name
> > in a pointer implies a forward declaration.
> 
> Unless something changed recently that only works for struct members,
> function args need an explicit forward declaration.

Not for pointers:

   "You can't use an incomplete type to declare a variable or field,
    or use it for a function parameter or return type. [...]
    However, you can define a pointer to an incomplete type,
    and declare a variable or field with such a pointer type.
    In general, you can do everything with such pointers except
    dereference them."

    https://gnu-c-language-manual.github.io/GNU-C-Language-Manual/Incomplete-Types.html

That's the case here:

    struct r8169_led_classdev;
    struct r8169_led_classdev *rtl8168_init_leds(struct net_device *ndev);
    void r8169_remove_leds(struct r8169_led_classdev *leds);

In this particular case, struct r8169_led_classdev is only used as a
*pointer* passed to or returned from a function.  There's no need
for a forward declaration of the type behind the pointer.

Thanks,

Lukas