public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	jacob.e.keller@intel.com, michal.kubiak@intel.com,
	maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com,
	przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com, wojciech.drewek@intel.com,
	pio.raczynski@gmail.com, jiri@nvidia.com,
	nex.sw.ncis.osdt.itp.upstreaming@intel.com,
	mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com,
	Piotr Raczynski <piotr.raczynski@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [iwl-next v3 3/7] ice: add basic devlink subfunctions support
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 11:10:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZhzvGlDiuaPSEHCX@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zhzny769lYYmLUs0@mev-dev>

Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 10:39:39AM CEST, michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 09:12:18AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 08:30:49AM CEST, michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com wrote:
>> >From: Piotr Raczynski <piotr.raczynski@intel.com>

[...]

>> >+static int
>> >+ice_devlink_port_fn_state_get(struct devlink_port *port,
>> >+			      enum devlink_port_fn_state *state,
>> >+			      enum devlink_port_fn_opstate *opstate,
>> >+			      struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> >+{
>> >+	struct ice_dynamic_port *dyn_port;
>> >+
>> >+	dyn_port = ice_devlink_port_to_dyn(port);
>> >+
>> >+	if (dyn_port->active) {
>> >+		*state = DEVLINK_PORT_FN_STATE_ACTIVE;
>> >+		*opstate = DEVLINK_PORT_FN_OPSTATE_ATTACHED;
>> 
>> Interesting. This means that you don't distinguish between admin state
>> and operational state. Meaning, when user does activate, you atomically
>> achive the hw attachment and it is ready to go before activation cmd
>> returns, correct? I'm just making sure I understand the code.
>> 
>
>I am setting the dyn_port->active after the activation heppens, so it is
>true, when active is set it is ready to go.
>
>Do you mean that dyn_port->active should be set even before the activation is
>finished? I mean when user only call devlink to active the port?

The devlink instance lock is taken the whole time, isn't it?

>
>> 
>> >+	} else {
>> >+		*state = DEVLINK_PORT_FN_STATE_INACTIVE;
>> >+		*opstate = DEVLINK_PORT_FN_OPSTATE_DETACHED;
>> >+	}
>> >+
>> >+	return 0;
>> >+}
>> >+

[...]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-15  9:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-12  6:30 [iwl-next v3 0/7] ice: support devlink subfunction Michal Swiatkowski
2024-04-12  6:30 ` [iwl-next v3 1/7] ice: add new VSI type for subfunctions Michal Swiatkowski
2024-04-12  6:30 ` [iwl-next v3 2/7] ice: export ice ndo_ops functions Michal Swiatkowski
2024-04-12  6:30 ` [iwl-next v3 3/7] ice: add basic devlink subfunctions support Michal Swiatkowski
2024-04-12  7:12   ` Jiri Pirko
2024-04-15  8:39     ` Michal Swiatkowski
2024-04-15  9:10       ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2024-04-16  5:14         ` Michal Swiatkowski
2024-04-16  6:16           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Michal Swiatkowski
2024-04-16 12:09             ` Jiri Pirko
2024-04-12  6:30 ` [iwl-next v3 4/7] ice: allocate devlink for subfunction Michal Swiatkowski
2024-04-12  7:24   ` Jiri Pirko
2024-04-15  8:40     ` Michal Swiatkowski
2024-04-12  6:30 ` [iwl-next v3 5/7] ice: base subfunction aux driver Michal Swiatkowski
2024-04-12  7:20   ` Jiri Pirko
2024-04-12 11:44   ` Przemek Kitszel
2024-04-15  8:29     ` Michal Swiatkowski
2024-04-12  6:30 ` [iwl-next v3 6/7] ice: implement netdev for subfunction Michal Swiatkowski
2024-04-12  7:21   ` Jiri Pirko
2024-04-12  6:30 ` [iwl-next v3 7/7] ice: allow to activate and deactivate subfunction Michal Swiatkowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZhzvGlDiuaPSEHCX@nanopsycho \
    --to=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com \
    --cc=michal.kubiak@intel.com \
    --cc=michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nex.sw.ncis.osdt.itp.upstreaming@intel.com \
    --cc=pio.raczynski@gmail.com \
    --cc=piotr.raczynski@intel.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    --cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
    --cc=wojciech.drewek@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox