From: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@nvidia.com>
To: Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>,
Yossi Kuperman <yossiku@nvidia.com>,
Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 0/4] Fix isolation of broadcast traffic and unmatched unicast traffic with MACsec offload
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 15:38:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZiQZt6m-KOcOYHqP@f4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240419213033.400467-1-rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>
On 2024-04-19 14:30 -0700, Rahul Rameshbabu wrote:
> Some device drivers support devices that enable them to annotate whether a
> Rx skb refers to a packet that was processed by the MACsec offloading
> functionality of the device. Logic in the Rx handling for MACsec offload
> does not utilize this information to preemptively avoid forwarding to the
> macsec netdev currently. Because of this, things like multicast messages or
> unicast messages with an unmatched destination address such as ARP requests
> are forwarded to the macsec netdev whether the message received was MACsec
> encrypted or not. The goal of this patch series is to improve the Rx
> handling for MACsec offload for devices capable of annotating skbs received
> that were decrypted by the NIC offload for MACsec.
>
> Here is a summary of the issue that occurs with the existing logic today.
>
> * The current design of the MACsec offload handling path tries to use
> "best guess" mechanisms for determining whether a packet associated
> with the currently handled skb in the datapath was processed via HW
> offload
> * The best guess mechanism uses the following heuristic logic (in order of
> precedence)
> - Check if header destination MAC address matches MACsec netdev MAC
> address -> forward to MACsec port
> - Check if packet is multicast traffic -> forward to MACsec port
> - MACsec security channel was able to be looked up from skb offload
> context (mlx5 only) -> forward to MACsec port
> * Problem: plaintext traffic can potentially solicit a MACsec encrypted
> response from the offload device
> - Core aspect of MACsec is that it identifies unauthorized LAN connections
> and excludes them from communication
> + This behavior can be seen when not enabling offload for MACsec
> - The offload behavior violates this principle in MACsec
>
> I believe this behavior is a security bug since applications utilizing
> MACsec could be exploited using this behavior, and the correct way to
> resolve this is by having the hardware correctly indicate whether MACsec
> offload occurred for the packet or not. In the patches in this series, I
> leave a warning for when the problematic path occurs because I cannot
> figure out a secure way to fix the security issue that applies to the core
> MACsec offload handling in the Rx path without breaking MACsec offload for
> other vendors.
>
> Shown at the bottom is an example use case where plaintext traffic sent to
> a physical port of a NIC configured for MACsec offload is unable to be
> handled correctly by the software stack when the NIC provides awareness to
> the kernel about whether the received packet is MACsec traffic or not. In
> this specific example, plaintext ARP requests are being responded with
> MACsec encrypted ARP replies (which leads to routing information being
> unable to be built for the requester).
>
> Side 1
>
> ip link del macsec0
> ip address flush mlx5_1
> ip address add 1.1.1.1/24 dev mlx5_1
> ip link set dev mlx5_1 up
> ip link add link mlx5_1 macsec0 type macsec sci 1 encrypt on
> ip link set dev macsec0 address 00:11:22:33:44:66
> ip macsec offload macsec0 mac
> ip macsec add macsec0 tx sa 0 pn 1 on key 00 dffafc8d7b9a43d5b9a3dfbbf6a30c16
> ip macsec add macsec0 rx sci 2 on
> ip macsec add macsec0 rx sci 2 sa 0 pn 1 on key 00 ead3664f508eb06c40ac7104cdae4ce5
> ip address flush macsec0
> ip address add 2.2.2.1/24 dev macsec0
> ip link set dev macsec0 up
>
> # macsec0 enters promiscuous mode.
> # This enables all traffic received on macsec_vlan to be processed by
> # the macsec offload rx datapath. This however means that traffic
> # meant to be received by mlx5_1 will be incorrectly steered to
> # macsec0 as well.
>
> ip link add link macsec0 name macsec_vlan type vlan id 1
> ip link set dev macsec_vlan address 00:11:22:33:44:88
> ip address flush macsec_vlan
> ip address add 3.3.3.1/24 dev macsec_vlan
> ip link set dev macsec_vlan up
>
> Side 2
>
> ip link del macsec0
> ip address flush mlx5_1
> ip address add 1.1.1.2/24 dev mlx5_1
> ip link set dev mlx5_1 up
> ip link add link mlx5_1 macsec0 type macsec sci 2 encrypt on
> ip link set dev macsec0 address 00:11:22:33:44:77
> ip macsec offload macsec0 mac
> ip macsec add macsec0 tx sa 0 pn 1 on key 00 ead3664f508eb06c40ac7104cdae4ce5
> ip macsec add macsec0 rx sci 1 on
> ip macsec add macsec0 rx sci 1 sa 0 pn 1 on key 00 dffafc8d7b9a43d5b9a3dfbbf6a30c16
> ip address flush macsec0
> ip address add 2.2.2.2/24 dev macsec0
> ip link set dev macsec0 up
>
> # macsec0 enters promiscuous mode.
> # This enables all traffic received on macsec_vlan to be processed by
> # the macsec offload rx datapath. This however means that traffic
> # meant to be received by mlx5_1 will be incorrectly steered to
> # macsec0 as well.
>
> ip link add link macsec0 name macsec_vlan type vlan id 1
> ip link set dev macsec_vlan address 00:11:22:33:44:99
> ip address flush macsec_vlan
> ip address add 3.3.3.2/24 dev macsec_vlan
> ip link set dev macsec_vlan up
>
> Side 1
>
> ping -I mlx5_1 1.1.1.2
> PING 1.1.1.2 (1.1.1.2) from 1.1.1.1 mlx5_1: 56(84) bytes of data.
> From 1.1.1.1 icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable
> ping: sendmsg: No route to host
> From 1.1.1.1 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable
> From 1.1.1.1 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable
>
> Changes:
>
> v1->v2:
> * Fixed series subject to detail the issue being fixed
> * Removed strange characters from cover letter
> * Added comment in example that illustrates the impact involving
> promiscuous mode
> * Added patch for generalizing packet type detection
> * Added Fixes: tags and targeting net
> * Removed pointless warning in the heuristic Rx path for macsec offload
> * Applied small refactor in Rx path offload to minimize scope of rx_sc
> local variable
>
> Link: https://github.com/Binary-Eater/macsec-rx-offload/blob/trunk/MACsec_violation_in_core_stack_offload_rx_handling.pdf
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240419011740.333714-1-rrameshbabu@nvidia.com/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/87r0l25y1c.fsf@nvidia.com/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231116182900.46052-1-rrameshbabu@nvidia.com/
> Cc: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@nvidia.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-20 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-19 21:30 [PATCH net v2 0/4] Fix isolation of broadcast traffic and unmatched unicast traffic with MACsec offload Rahul Rameshbabu
2024-04-19 21:30 ` [PATCH net v2 1/4] macsec: Enable devices to advertise whether they update sk_buff md_dst during offloads Rahul Rameshbabu
2024-04-19 21:30 ` [PATCH net v2 2/4] ethernet: Add helper for assigning packet type when dest address does not match device address Rahul Rameshbabu
2024-04-23 13:51 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2024-04-23 17:03 ` Rahul Rameshbabu
2024-04-19 21:30 ` [PATCH net v2 3/4] macsec: Detect if Rx skb is macsec-related for offloading devices that update md_dst Rahul Rameshbabu
2024-04-19 21:30 ` [PATCH net v2 4/4] net/mlx5e: Advertise mlx5 ethernet driver updates sk_buff md_dst for MACsec Rahul Rameshbabu
2024-04-20 19:38 ` Benjamin Poirier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZiQZt6m-KOcOYHqP@f4 \
--to=bpoirier@nvidia.com \
--cc=cratiu@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rrameshbabu@nvidia.com \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=yossiku@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).