From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
davem@davemloft.net, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: "Maxime Chevallier" <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
"Herve Codina" <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Heiner Kallweit" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"Vladimir Oltean" <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
"Köry Maincent" <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>,
"Jesse Brandeburg" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
"Marek Behún" <kabel@kernel.org>,
"Piergiorgio Beruto" <piergiorgio.beruto@gmail.com>,
"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
"Nicolò Veronese" <nicveronese@gmail.com>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
mwojtas@chromium.org, "Antoine Tenart" <atenart@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] Fix phy_link_topology initialization
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 10:15:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZkHaRD8WGrhrzemn@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240513063636.GA652533@thelio-3990X>
On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 11:36:36PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
> On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 12:28:19PM +0200, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> > Nathan and Heiner reported issues that occur when phylib and phy drivers
> > built as modules expect the phy_link_topology to be initialized, due to
> > wrong use of IS_REACHABLE.
> >
> > This small fixup series addresses that by moving the initialization code
> > into net/core/dev.c, but at the same time implementing lazy
> > initialization to only allocate the topology upon the first PHY
> > insertion.
> >
> > This needed some refactoring, namely pass the netdevice itself as a
> > parameter for phy_link_topology helpers.
> >
> > Thanks Heiner for the help on untangling this, and Nathan for the
> > report.
>
> Are you able to prioritize getting this series merged? This has been a
> problem in -next for over a month now and the merge window is now open.
> I would hate to see this regress in mainline, as my main system may be
> affected by it (not sure, I got a new test machine that got bit by it in
> addition to the other two I noticed it on).
... and Maxime has been working on trying to get an acceptable fix for
it over that time, with to-and-fro discussions. Maxime still hasn't got
an ack from Heiner for the fixes, and changes are still being
requested.
I think, sadly, the only way forward at this point would be to revert
the original commit. I've just tried reverting 6916e461e793 in my
net-next tree and it's possible, although a little noisy:
$ git revert 6916e461e793
Performing inexact rename detection: 100% (8904/8904), done.
Auto-merging net/core/dev.c
Auto-merging include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h
Removing include/linux/phy_link_topology_core.h
Removing include/linux/phy_link_topology.h
Auto-merging include/linux/phy.h
Auto-merging include/linux/netdevice.h
Removing drivers/net/phy/phy_link_topology.c
Auto-merging drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
Auto-merging MAINTAINERS
hint: Waiting for your editor to close the file...
I haven't checked whether that ends up with something that's buildable.
Any views Jakub/Dave/Paolo?
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-13 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-07 10:28 [PATCH net-next 0/2] Fix phy_link_topology initialization Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-07 10:28 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: phy: phy_link_topology: Pass netdevice to phy_link_topo helpers Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-08 5:43 ` Heiner Kallweit
2024-05-07 10:28 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: phy: phy_link_topology: Lazy-initialize the link topology Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-07 23:08 ` kernel test robot
2024-05-08 5:44 ` Heiner Kallweit
2024-05-13 7:30 ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-13 8:07 ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-13 8:15 ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-13 6:36 ` [PATCH net-next 0/2] Fix phy_link_topology initialization Nathan Chancellor
2024-05-13 9:15 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2024-05-13 15:11 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-05-14 6:46 ` Maxime Chevallier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZkHaRD8WGrhrzemn@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=atenart@kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=kabel@kernel.org \
--cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=mwojtas@chromium.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicveronese@gmail.com \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=piergiorgio.beruto@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).