From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>,
syzbot+0c4150bff9fff3bf023c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [Patch net] net: remove the bogus overflow debug check in pskb_may_pull()
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 09:14:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZmMxzPoDTNu06itR@pop-os.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240606232747.GE9890@breakpoint.cc>
On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 01:27:47AM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> wrote:
> > From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
> >
> > Commit 219eee9c0d16 ("net: skbuff: add overflow debug check to pull/push
> > helpers") introduced an overflow debug check for pull/push helpers.
> > For __skb_pull() this makes sense because its callers rarely check its
> > return value. But for pskb_may_pull() it does not make sense, since its
> > return value is properly taken care of. Remove the one in
> > pskb_may_pull(), we can continue rely on its return value.
>
> See 025f8ad20f2e3264d11683aa9cbbf0083eefbdcd which would not exist
> without this check, I would not give up yet.
What's the point of that commit?
The "fix" (I doubt it fixes anything) you had is merely exiting a few
lines earlier than pskb_may_pull():
30 if (!skb_inner_network_header_was_set(skb))
31 goto out;
32
33 skb_reset_network_header(skb);
34 mpls_hlen = skb_inner_network_header(skb) - skb_network_header(skb);
35 if (unlikely(!mpls_hlen || mpls_hlen % MPLS_HLEN))
36 goto out;
37 if (unlikely(!pskb_may_pull(skb, mpls_hlen)))
38 goto out;
Before your "fix", we exit on line 37. After your "fix", we exit on line
30. I don't see any difference here, it returns -EINVAL anyway.
>
> bpf_try_make_writable() could do an explicit check vs. skb->len.
But why? I don't see the point of its existence. pskb_may_pull() already
checks it very well:
2741 if (unlikely(len > skb->len))
2742 return SKB_DROP_REASON_PKT_TOO_SMALL;
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-07 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-06 22:15 [Patch net] net: remove the bogus overflow debug check in pskb_may_pull() Cong Wang
2024-06-06 23:27 ` Florian Westphal
2024-06-07 16:14 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2024-06-07 21:32 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-06-08 8:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-06-08 22:24 ` Florian Westphal
2024-06-09 2:01 ` Jason Xing
2024-06-14 10:17 ` [PATCH bpf] bpf: avoid splat in pskb_pull_reason Florian Westphal
2024-06-14 12:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-06-14 15:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZmMxzPoDTNu06itR@pop-os.localdomain \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+0c4150bff9fff3bf023c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox