From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Youwan Wang <youwan@nfschina.com>, andrew@lunn.ch
Cc: hkallweit1@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: phy_device: fix PHY WOL enabled, PM failed to suspend
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 09:17:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zn5xmMpTLK/fRoYh@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240628060318.458925-1-youwan@nfschina.com>
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 02:03:18PM +0800, Youwan Wang wrote:
> If the PHY of the mido bus is enabled with Wake-on-LAN (WOL),
> we cannot suspend the PHY. Although the WOL status has been
> checked in phy_suspend(), returning -EBUSY(-16) would cause
> the Power Management (PM) to fail to suspend. Since
> phy_suspend() is an exported symbol (EXPORT_SYMBOL),
> timely error reporting is needed. Therefore, an additional
> check is performed here. If the PHY of the mido bus is enabled
> with WOL, we skip calling phy_suspend() to avoid PM failure.
>
> log:
> [ 322.631362] OOM killer disabled.
> [ 322.631364] Freezing remaining freezable tasks
> [ 322.632536] Freezing remaining freezable tasks completed (elapsed 0.001 seconds)
> [ 322.632540] printk: Suspending console(s) (use no_console_suspend to debug)
> [ 322.633052] YT8521 Gigabit Ethernet stmmac-0:01:
> PM: dpm_run_callback(): mdio_bus_phy_suspend+0x0/0x110 [libphy] returns -16
> [ 322.633071] YT8521 Gigabit Ethernet stmmac-0:01:
> PM: failed to suspend: error -16
> [ 322.669699] PM: Some devices failed to suspend, or early wake event detected
> [ 322.669949] OOM killer enabled.
> [ 322.669951] Restarting tasks ... done.
> [ 322.671008] random: crng reseeded on system resumption
> [ 322.671014] PM: suspend exit
>
> If the YT8521 driver adds phydrv->flags, ask the YT8521 driver to process
> WOL at suspend and resume time, the phydev->suspended_by_mdio_bus=1
> flag would cause the resume failure.
I think the reason this is happening is because the PHY has WoL enabled
on it without the kernel/netdev driver being aware that WoL is enabled.
Thus, mdio_bus_phy_may_suspend() returns true, allowing the suspend to
happen, but then we find unexpectedly that WoL is enabled on the PHY.
However, whenever a user configures WoL, netdev->wol_enabled will be
set when _any_ WoL mode is enabled and cleared only if all WoL modes
are disabled.
Thus, what we have is a de-sync between the kernel state and hardware
state, leading to the suspend failing.
I don't see anything in the motorcomm driver that requires suspend
if WoL is enabled - yt8521_suspend() first checks to see whether WoL
is enabled, and exits if it is.
Andrew - how do you feel about reading the WoL state from the PHY and
setting netdev->wol_enabled if any WoL is enabled on the PHY? That
would mean that the netdev's WoL state is consistent with the PHY
whether or not the user has configured WoL.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-28 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-28 6:03 [PATCH] net: phy: phy_device: fix PHY WOL enabled, PM failed to suspend Youwan Wang
2024-06-28 8:17 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2024-06-28 8:25 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-06-28 8:38 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-06-28 8:48 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-06-28 9:24 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-06-28 9:37 ` Florian Fainelli
[not found] ` <20240701062144.552508-1-youwan@nfschina.com>
2024-07-01 16:32 ` [net-next,v1] " Andrew Lunn
2024-07-09 11:37 ` [net-next,v2] " Youwan Wang
2024-07-29 8:03 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-07-30 8:15 ` [net-next,v3] " Youwan Wang
2024-07-30 9:28 ` Wojciech Drewek
2024-07-31 9:15 ` [net-next,v4] " Youwan Wang
2024-07-31 13:41 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-01 15:51 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-07 2:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2024-07-30 0:48 ` [net-next,v3] " Youwan Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zn5xmMpTLK/fRoYh@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=youwan@nfschina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).