From: Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@intel.com>
To: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
<pabeni@redhat.com>, <horms@kernel.org>, <andrew@lunn.ch>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
<mengyuanlou@net-swift.com>, <duanqiangwen@net-swift.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 2/4] net: txgbe: remove separate irq request for MSI and INTx
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 15:33:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZoVTJIGmBMP4gCD3@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240701071416.8468-3-jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>
On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 03:14:14PM +0800, Jiawen Wu wrote:
> When using MSI or INTx interrupts, request_irq() for pdev->irq will
> conflict with request_threaded_irq() for txgbe->misc.irq, to cause
> system crash. So remove txgbe_request_irq() for MSI/INTx case, and
> rename txgbe_request_msix_irqs() since it only request for queue irqs.
>
Could you please provide any test scenario how the crash can be
reproduced and/or add an example crash log?
Also, could you describe how request_irq() conflicts with
request_threaded_irq() in this case?
> Add wx->misc_irq_domain to determine whether the driver creates an IRQ
> domain and threaded request the IRQs.
>
> Fixes: aefd013624a1 ("net: txgbe: use irq_domain for interrupt controller")
> Signed-off-by: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_hw.c | 1 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_lib.c | 5 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_type.h | 1 +
> .../net/ethernet/wangxun/txgbe/txgbe_irq.c | 80 ++-----------------
> .../net/ethernet/wangxun/txgbe/txgbe_irq.h | 2 +-
> .../net/ethernet/wangxun/txgbe/txgbe_main.c | 2 +-
> 6 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_hw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_hw.c
> index 7c4b6881a93f..d1b682ce9c6d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_hw.c
> @@ -1959,6 +1959,7 @@ int wx_sw_init(struct wx *wx)
> }
>
> bitmap_zero(wx->state, WX_STATE_NBITS);
> + wx->misc_irq_domain = false;
>
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_lib.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_lib.c
> index f53776877f71..e1f514b21090 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_lib.c
> @@ -1997,7 +1997,8 @@ void wx_free_irq(struct wx *wx)
> int vector;
>
> if (!(pdev->msix_enabled)) {
> - free_irq(pdev->irq, wx);
> + if (!wx->misc_irq_domain)
> + free_irq(pdev->irq, wx);
Does it mean "pdev->irq" will never be freed if you set misc_irq_domain
to "true"? It seems you set it to true always during the initializaion,
in "txgbe_setup_misc_irq()"?
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -2012,7 +2013,7 @@ void wx_free_irq(struct wx *wx)
> free_irq(entry->vector, q_vector);
> }
>
> - if (wx->mac.type == wx_mac_em)
> + if (!wx->misc_irq_domain)
> free_irq(wx->msix_entry->vector, wx);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(wx_free_irq);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_type.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_type.h
> index 5aaf7b1fa2db..0df7f5712b6f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_type.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_type.h
> @@ -1058,6 +1058,7 @@ struct wx {
> dma_addr_t isb_dma;
> u32 *isb_mem;
> u32 isb_tag[WX_ISB_MAX];
> + bool misc_irq_domain;
I don't think that introducing a kind of global variable to determine the call
context is a good idea.
Also, it seems that member is always true after the "probe" context is
completed, isn't it?
>
[...]
> @@ -256,6 +190,8 @@ int txgbe_setup_misc_irq(struct txgbe *txgbe)
> if (err)
> goto free_gpio_irq;
>
> + wx->misc_irq_domain = true;
> +
> return 0;
>
Is there any chance that member will be set back to "false" after the
initialization is completed?
Thanks,
Michal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-03 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-01 7:14 [PATCH net v3 0/4] net: txgbe: fix MSI and INTx interrupts Jiawen Wu
2024-07-01 7:14 ` [PATCH net v3 1/4] net: txgbe: initialize num_q_vectors for MSI/INTx interrupts Jiawen Wu
2024-07-02 15:21 ` Michal Kubiak
2024-07-03 1:45 ` Jiawen Wu
2024-07-01 7:14 ` [PATCH net v3 2/4] net: txgbe: remove separate irq request for MSI and INTx Jiawen Wu
2024-07-03 13:33 ` Michal Kubiak [this message]
2024-07-03 14:53 ` Michal Kubiak
2024-07-01 7:14 ` [PATCH net v3 3/4] net: txgbe: add extra handle for MSI/INTx into thread irq handle Jiawen Wu
2024-07-01 7:14 ` [PATCH net v3 4/4] net: txgbe: free isb resources at the right time Jiawen Wu
2024-07-02 14:10 ` [PATCH net v3 0/4] net: txgbe: fix MSI and INTx interrupts patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZoVTJIGmBMP4gCD3@localhost.localdomain \
--to=michal.kubiak@intel.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=duanqiangwen@net-swift.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jiawenwu@trustnetic.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=mengyuanlou@net-swift.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).