From: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dsahern@kernel.org,
roopa@cumulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] ipv4: Fix incorrect TOS in fibmatch route get reply
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 20:11:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zpa30mhAqoG5FP1X@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240715142354.3697987-3-idosch@nvidia.com>
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 05:23:54PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> The TOS value that is returned to user space in the route get reply is
> the one with which the lookup was performed ('fl4->flowi4_tos'). This is
> fine when the matched route is configured with a TOS as it would not
> match if its TOS value did not match the one with which the lookup was
> performed.
>
> However, matching on TOS is only performed when the route's TOS is not
> zero. It is therefore possible to have the kernel incorrectly return a
> non-zero TOS:
>
> # ip link add name dummy1 up type dummy
> # ip address add 192.0.2.1/24 dev dummy1
> # ip route get fibmatch 192.0.2.2 tos 0xfc
> 192.0.2.0/24 tos 0x1c dev dummy1 proto kernel scope link src 192.0.2.1
>
> Fix by instead returning the DSCP field from the FIB result structure
> which was populated during the route lookup.
>
> Output after the patch:
>
> # ip link add name dummy1 up type dummy
> # ip address add 192.0.2.1/24 dev dummy1
> # ip route get fibmatch 192.0.2.2 tos 0xfc
> 192.0.2.0/24 dev dummy1 proto kernel scope link src 192.0.2.1
>
> Extend the existing selftests to not only verify that the correct route
> is returned, but that it is also returned with correct "tos" value (or
> without it).
Good catch!
Reviewed-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-16 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-15 14:23 [PATCH net 0/2] ipv4: Fix incorrect TOS in route get reply Ido Schimmel
2024-07-15 14:23 ` [PATCH net 1/2] " Ido Schimmel
2024-07-15 22:33 ` David Ahern
2024-07-16 18:10 ` Guillaume Nault
2024-07-15 14:23 ` [PATCH net 2/2] ipv4: Fix incorrect TOS in fibmatch " Ido Schimmel
2024-07-15 22:34 ` David Ahern
2024-07-16 18:11 ` Guillaume Nault [this message]
2024-07-18 9:20 ` [PATCH net 0/2] ipv4: Fix incorrect TOS in " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zpa30mhAqoG5FP1X@debian \
--to=gnault@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).