From: Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@gmail.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"KP Singh" <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
"Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf@fomichev.me>,
"Hao Luo" <haoluo@google.com>, "Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"Mykola Lysenko" <mykolal@fb.com>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>, "Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>,
"Magnus Karlsson" <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
"Maciej Fijalkowski" <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
"Jonathan Lemon" <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Yan Zhai" <yan@cloudflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 7/8] selftests/bpf: Fix using stdout, stderr as struct field names
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 21:22:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZqR2DuHdBXPX/yx8@kodidev-ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzauQQgWfc8eKsWF+Fr-j--oY6tJAM2+ZfAPHP7JJqZ6Zg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 01:27:03PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 3:39 AM Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@gmail.com>
> >
> > Typically stdin, stdout, stderr are treated as reserved identifiers under
> > ISO/ANSI C, and a libc implementation is free to define these as macros.
>
> Ok, wow that. Do you have a pointer to where in the standard it is
> said that stdin/stdout/stderr is some sort of reserved identifier that
> can't be used as a field name?
>
I'll need to dig around to share some references. The short answer IIRC
is there's enough potential variation in their definitions that their
use requires care (or better avoidance).
>
> I really don't like these underscored field names. If we have to
> rename, I'd prefer something like env.saved_stdout instead of
> env._stdout. But I'd prefer even more if musl wasn't doing this macro
> definition, of course...
OK, I'll use clearer names for a v2.
I believe the macro definitions are quite common and old, but "how"
makes a difference: specifically, using parenthesis happens to break our
.stdxxx field names.
In glibc <stdio.h> we have for example:
...
/* Standard streams. */
extern FILE *stdin; /* Standard input stream. */
extern FILE *stdout; /* Standard output stream. */
extern FILE *stderr; /* Standard error output stream. */
/* C89/C99 say they're macros. Make them happy. */
#define stdin stdin
#define stdout stdout
#define stderr stderr
...
while in musl <stdio.h> we have:
...
extern FILE *const stdin;
extern FILE *const stdout;
extern FILE *const stderr;
#define stdin (stdin)
#define stdout (stdout)
#define stderr (stderr)
...
which borks code in test_progs.c:
...
env.stderr = stderr;
env.stdout = stdout;
...
>
> > This is the case in musl libc and results in compile errors when these
> > names are reused as struct fields, as with 'struct test_env' and related
> > usage in test_progs.[ch] and reg_bounds.c.
> >
> > Rename the fields to _stdout and _stderr to avoid many errors seen building
> > against musl, e.g.:
> >
> > In file included from test_progs.h:6,
> > from test_progs.c:5:
> > test_progs.c: In function 'print_test_result':
> > test_progs.c:237:21: error: expected identifier before '(' token
> > 237 | fprintf(env.stdout, "#%-*d %s:", TEST_NUM_WIDTH, test->test_num, test->test_name);
> > | ^~~~~~
> > test_progs.c:237:9: error: too few arguments to function 'fprintf'
> > 237 | fprintf(env.stdout, "#%-*d %s:", TEST_NUM_WIDTH, test->test_num, test->test_name);
> > | ^~~~~~~
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reg_bounds.c | 2 +-
> > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c | 66 +++++++++----------
> > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h | 8 +--
> > 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> >
>
> [...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-27 4:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-25 10:35 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/8] selftests/bpf: Improve libc portability / musl support (part 2) Tony Ambardar
2024-07-25 10:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/8] selftests/bpf: Use portable POSIX basename() Tony Ambardar
2024-07-25 10:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/8] selftests/bpf: Fix arg parsing in veristat, test_progs Tony Ambardar
2024-07-25 20:09 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-27 3:34 ` Tony Ambardar
2024-07-25 10:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/8] selftests/bpf: Fix error compiling test_lru_map.c Tony Ambardar
2024-07-25 10:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/8] selftests/bpf: Fix C++ compile error from missing _Bool type Tony Ambardar
2024-07-25 10:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 5/8] selftests/bpf: Fix order-of-include compile errors in lwt_reroute.c Tony Ambardar
2024-07-25 20:18 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-27 3:56 ` Tony Ambardar
2024-07-25 10:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 6/8] selftests/bpf: Fix compile if backtrace support missing in libc Tony Ambardar
2024-07-25 20:22 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-27 3:48 ` Tony Ambardar
2024-07-29 17:50 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-25 10:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 7/8] selftests/bpf: Fix using stdout, stderr as struct field names Tony Ambardar
2024-07-25 20:27 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-07-27 4:22 ` Tony Ambardar [this message]
2024-07-29 8:48 ` Tony Ambardar
2024-07-25 10:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 8/8] selftests/bpf: Fix error compiling tc_redirect.c with musl libc Tony Ambardar
2024-07-29 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/8] selftests/bpf: Improve libc portability / musl support (part 2) Tony Ambardar
2024-07-29 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/8] selftests/bpf: Use portable POSIX basename() Tony Ambardar
2024-07-30 20:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2024-07-29 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/8] selftests/bpf: Fix arg parsing in veristat, test_progs Tony Ambardar
2024-07-29 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/8] selftests/bpf: Fix error compiling test_lru_map.c Tony Ambardar
2024-07-29 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/8] selftests/bpf: Fix C++ compile error from missing _Bool type Tony Ambardar
2024-07-29 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/8] selftests/bpf: Fix redefinition errors compiling lwt_reroute.c Tony Ambardar
2024-07-29 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/8] selftests/bpf: Fix compile if backtrace support missing in libc Tony Ambardar
2024-07-29 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 7/8] selftests/bpf: Fix using stdout, stderr as struct field names Tony Ambardar
2024-07-29 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 8/8] selftests/bpf: Fix error compiling tc_redirect.c with musl libc Tony Ambardar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZqR2DuHdBXPX/yx8@kodidev-ubuntu \
--to=tony.ambardar@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yan@cloudflare.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox