public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tahera Fahimi <fahimitahera@gmail.com>
To: outreachy@lists.linux.dev
Cc: mic@digikod.net, gnoack@google.com, paul@paul-moore.com,
	jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com,
	jannh@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] Landlock: Document LANDLOCK_SCOPED_SIGNAL
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 15:07:00 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zr5t9NbA/RiXtHSN@tahera-OptiPlex-5000> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <193b5874eab4dca132ae3c71d44adfc21022a0ad.1723680305.git.fahimitahera@gmail.com>

On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 12:29:25PM -0600, Tahera Fahimi wrote:
> Improving Landlock ABI version 6 to support signal scoping
> with LANDLOCK_SCOPED_SIGNAL.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tahera Fahimi <fahimitahera@gmail.com>
> ---
> v3:
> - update date
> ---
>  Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst | 25 +++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst
> index 0582f93bd952..01e4d50851af 100644
> --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst
> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Landlock: unprivileged access control
>  =====================================
>  
>  :Author: Mickaël Salaün
> -:Date: July 2024
> +:Date: August 2024
>  
>  The goal of Landlock is to enable to restrict ambient rights (e.g. global
>  filesystem or network access) for a set of processes.  Because Landlock
> @@ -82,7 +82,8 @@ to be explicit about the denied-by-default access rights.
>              LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP |
>              LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP,
>          .scoped =
> -            LANDLOCK_SCOPED_ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET,
> +            LANDLOCK_SCOPED_ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET |
> +            LANDLOCK_SCOPED_SIGNAL,
>      };
>  
>  Because we may not know on which kernel version an application will be
> @@ -123,7 +124,8 @@ version, and only use the available subset of access rights:
>          ruleset_attr.handled_access_fs &= ~LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV;
>      case 5:
>          /* Removes LANDLOCK_SCOPED_ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET for ABI < 6 */
> -        ruleset_attr.scoped &= ~LANDLOCK_SCOPED_ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET;
> +        ruleset_attr.scoped &= ~(LANDLOCK_SCOPED_ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET |
> +                                 LANDLOCK_SCOPED_SIGNAL);
>      }
>  
>  This enables to create an inclusive ruleset that will contain our rules.
> @@ -319,11 +321,15 @@ interactions between sandboxes. Each Landlock domain can be explicitly scoped
>  for a set of actions by specifying it on a ruleset. For example, if a sandboxed
>  process should not be able to :manpage:`connect(2)` to a non-sandboxed process
>  through abstract :manpage:`unix(7)` sockets, we can specify such restriction
> -with ``LANDLOCK_SCOPED_ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET``.
> +with ``LANDLOCK_SCOPED_ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET``. Moreover, if a sandboxed process
> +should not be able to send a signal to a non-sandboxed process, we can specify
> +this restriction with ``LANDLOCK_SCOPED_SIGNAL``.
>  
>  A sandboxed process can connect to a non-sandboxed process when its domain is
>  not scoped. If a process's domain is scoped, it can only connect to sockets
> -created by processes in the same scoped domain.
> +created by processes in the same scoped domain. Moreover, If a process is
> +scoped to send signal to a non-scoped process, it can only send signals to
> +processes in the same scoped domain.
>  
>  IPC scoping does not support Landlock rules, so if a domain is scoped, no rules
>  can be added to allow accessing to a resource outside of the scoped domain.
> @@ -563,12 +569,17 @@ earlier ABI.
>  Starting with the Landlock ABI version 5, it is possible to restrict the use of
>  :manpage:`ioctl(2)` using the new ``LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV`` right.
>  
> +<<<<<<< current
>  Abstract UNIX sockets Restriction  (ABI < 6)
>  --------------------------------------------
> +=======
> +Abstract Unix sockets and Signal Restriction  (ABI < 6)
> +-------------------------------------------------------
> +>>>>>>> patched
Sorry about this part. I will correct it. 
>  With ABI version 6, it is possible to restrict connection to an abstract Unix socket
> -through ``LANDLOCK_SCOPED_ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET``, thanks to the ``scoped`` ruleset
> -attribute.
> +through ``LANDLOCK_SCOPED_ABSTRACT_UNIX_SOCKET`` and sending signal through
> +``LANDLOCK_SCOPED_SIGNAL``, thanks to the ``scoped`` ruleset attribute.
>  
>  .. _kernel_support:
>  
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2024-08-15 21:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-15 18:29 [PATCH v3 0/6] Landlock: Signal Scoping Support Tahera Fahimi
2024-08-15 18:29 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] Landlock: Add signal control Tahera Fahimi
2024-08-15 18:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] Landlock: Adding file_send_sigiotask signal scoping support Tahera Fahimi
2024-08-15 20:25   ` Jann Horn
2024-08-15 21:28     ` Tahera Fahimi
2024-08-15 22:10       ` Jann Horn
2024-08-15 23:06         ` Tahera Fahimi
2024-08-19 17:57   ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-08-21 10:13   ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-08-15 18:29 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] selftest/Landlock: Signal restriction tests Tahera Fahimi
2024-08-20 15:57   ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-08-26 12:40   ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-08-15 18:29 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] selftest/Landlock: pthread_kill(3) tests Tahera Fahimi
2024-08-20 15:57   ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-08-26 12:40     ` Mickaël Salaün
2024-08-15 18:29 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] sample/Landlock: Support signal scoping restriction Tahera Fahimi
2024-08-15 18:29 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] Landlock: Document LANDLOCK_SCOPED_SIGNAL Tahera Fahimi
2024-08-15 21:07   ` Tahera Fahimi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zr5t9NbA/RiXtHSN@tahera-OptiPlex-5000 \
    --to=fahimitahera@gmail.com \
    --cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
    --cc=gnoack@google.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=outreachy@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox