From: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Harshitha Ramamurthy <hramamurthy@google.com>,
"moderated list:INTEL ETHERNET DRIVERS"
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@google.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:MELLANOX MLX4 core VPI driver"
<linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Praveen Kaligineedi <pkaligineedi@google.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Shailend Chand <shailend@google.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
Ziwei Xiao <ziweixiao@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 0/6] Cleanup IRQ affinity checks in several drivers
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 08:14:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZrxZaHGDTO3ohHFH@LQ3V64L9R2.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240813171710.599d3f01@kernel.org>
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 05:17:10PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 14:56:21 +0000 Joe Damato wrote:
> > Several drivers make a check in their napi poll functions to determine
> > if the CPU affinity of the IRQ has changed. If it has, the napi poll
> > function returns a value less than the budget to force polling mode to
> > be disabled, so that it can be rescheduled on the correct CPU next time
> > the softirq is raised.
>
> Any reason not to use the irq number already stored in napi_struct ?
Thanks for taking a look.
IIUC, that's possible if i40e, iavf, and gve are updated to call
netif_napi_set_irq first, which I could certainly do.
But as Stanislav points out, I would be adding a call to
irq_get_effective_affinity_mask in the hot path where one did not
exist before for 4 of 5 drivers.
In that case, it might make more sense to introduce:
bool napi_affinity_no_change(const struct cpumask *aff_mask)
instead and the drivers which have a cached mask can pass it in and
gve can be updated later to cache it.
Not sure how crucial avoiding the irq_get_effective_affinity_mask
call is; I would guess maybe some driver owners would object to
adding a new call in the hot path where one didn't exist before.
What do you think?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-14 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-12 14:56 [RFC net-next 0/6] Cleanup IRQ affinity checks in several drivers Joe Damato
2024-08-12 14:56 ` [RFC net-next 1/6] netdevice: Add napi_affinity_no_change Joe Damato
2024-08-12 20:23 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2024-08-12 21:08 ` Joe Damato
2024-08-12 22:36 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2024-08-13 9:11 ` Joe Damato
2024-08-13 10:03 ` Joe Damato
2024-08-13 13:05 ` Simon Horman
2024-08-12 14:56 ` [RFC net-next 2/6] mlx5: Use napi_affinity_no_change Joe Damato
2024-08-12 14:56 ` [RFC net-next 3/6] gve: " Joe Damato
2024-08-13 18:55 ` Shailend Chand
2024-08-13 21:44 ` Joe Damato
2024-08-13 21:50 ` Shailend Chand
2024-08-12 14:56 ` [RFC net-next 4/6] i40e: " Joe Damato
2024-08-12 14:56 ` [RFC net-next 5/6] iavf: " Joe Damato
2024-08-12 14:56 ` [RFC net-next 6/6] mlx4: " Joe Damato
2024-08-14 0:17 ` [RFC net-next 0/6] Cleanup IRQ affinity checks in several drivers Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-14 7:14 ` Joe Damato [this message]
2024-08-14 12:12 ` Joe Damato
2024-08-14 15:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-14 15:19 ` Joe Damato
2024-08-14 16:03 ` Shay Drori
2024-08-14 18:01 ` Joe Damato
2024-08-15 0:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-15 10:22 ` Joe Damato
2024-08-20 6:40 ` Shay Drori
2024-08-20 8:33 ` Joe Damato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZrxZaHGDTO3ohHFH@LQ3V64L9R2.home \
--to=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hramamurthy@google.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jeroendb@google.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pkaligineedi@google.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=shailend@google.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
--cc=ziweixiao@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).