From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
<dsahern@kernel.org>, <willemb@google.com>
Cc: <oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] rxtimestamp.c: add the test for SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_SOFTWARE_FILTER
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 09:49:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZtUZpPISIpChbcRq@rli9-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240830153751.86895-3-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Hi Jason,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on net-next/main]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jason-Xing/net-timestamp-filter-out-report-when-setting-SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE/20240830-234014
base: net-next/main
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240830153751.86895-3-kerneljasonxing%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] rxtimestamp.c: add the test for SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_SOFTWARE_FILTER
:::::: branch date: 2 days ago
:::::: commit date: 2 days ago
compiler: clang version 18.1.5 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 617a15a9eac96088ae5e9134248d8236e34b91b1)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240902/202409020124.YybQQDrP-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202409020124.YybQQDrP-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> rxtimestamp.c:102:6: error: use of undeclared identifier 'SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_SOFTWARE_FILTER'
102 | | SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_SOFTWARE_FILTER },
| ^
>> rxtimestamp.c:373:20: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to an incomplete type 'struct test_case[]'
373 | for (t = 0; t < ARRAY_SIZE(test_cases); t++) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./../kselftest.h:61:32: note: expanded from macro 'ARRAY_SIZE'
61 | #define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]))
| ^~~~~
rxtimestamp.c:380:13: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to an incomplete type 'struct test_case[]'
380 | if (t >= ARRAY_SIZE(test_cases))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./../kselftest.h:61:32: note: expanded from macro 'ARRAY_SIZE'
61 | #define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]))
| ^~~~~
rxtimestamp.c:419:19: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to an incomplete type 'struct test_case[]'
419 | for (t = 0; t < ARRAY_SIZE(test_cases); t++) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./../kselftest.h:61:32: note: expanded from macro 'ARRAY_SIZE'
61 | #define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]))
| ^~~~~
4 errors generated.
vim +/SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_SOFTWARE_FILTER +102 tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 67
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 68 static struct test_case test_cases[] = {
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 69 { {}, {} },
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 70 {
f551e2fdaf81b7b tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c Tanner Love 2020-07-04 71 { .so_timestamp = 1 },
f551e2fdaf81b7b tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c Tanner Love 2020-07-04 72 { .tstamp = true }
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 73 },
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 74 {
f551e2fdaf81b7b tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c Tanner Love 2020-07-04 75 { .so_timestampns = 1 },
f551e2fdaf81b7b tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c Tanner Love 2020-07-04 76 { .tstampns = true }
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 77 },
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 78 {
f551e2fdaf81b7b tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c Tanner Love 2020-07-04 79 { .so_timestamp = 1, .so_timestampns = 1 },
f551e2fdaf81b7b tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c Tanner Love 2020-07-04 80 { .tstampns = true }
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 81 },
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 82 {
f551e2fdaf81b7b tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c Tanner Love 2020-07-04 83 { .so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE },
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 84 {}
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 85 },
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 86 {
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 87 /* Loopback device does not support hw timestamps. */
f551e2fdaf81b7b tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c Tanner Love 2020-07-04 88 { .so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE },
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 89 {}
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 90 },
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 91 {
f551e2fdaf81b7b tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c Tanner Love 2020-07-04 92 { .so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE },
f551e2fdaf81b7b tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c Tanner Love 2020-07-04 93 .warn_on_fail = true
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 94 },
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 95 {
f551e2fdaf81b7b tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c Tanner Love 2020-07-04 96 { .so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 97 | SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_HARDWARE },
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 98 {}
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 99 },
93e82194e6a4ec9 tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c Jason Xing 2024-08-30 100 {
93e82194e6a4ec9 tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c Jason Xing 2024-08-30 101 { .so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE
93e82194e6a4ec9 tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c Jason Xing 2024-08-30 @102 | SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_SOFTWARE_FILTER },
93e82194e6a4ec9 tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c Jason Xing 2024-08-30 103 {}
93e82194e6a4ec9 tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c Jason Xing 2024-08-30 104 },
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 105 {
f551e2fdaf81b7b tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c Tanner Love 2020-07-04 106 { .so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 107 | SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE },
f551e2fdaf81b7b tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c Tanner Love 2020-07-04 108 { .swtstamp = true }
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 109 },
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 110 {
f551e2fdaf81b7b tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c Tanner Love 2020-07-04 111 { .so_timestamp = 1, .so_timestamping = SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 112 | SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE },
f551e2fdaf81b7b tools/testing/selftests/net/rxtimestamp.c Tanner Love 2020-07-04 113 { .tstamp = true, .swtstamp = true }
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 114 },
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 115 };
16e781224198be0 tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp.c Mike Maloney 2017-08-22 116
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-02 1:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-30 15:37 [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] net-timestamp: introduce a flag to filter out rx software report Jason Xing
2024-08-30 15:37 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] net-timestamp: filter out report when setting SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE Jason Xing
2024-08-31 14:49 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-31 15:00 ` Jason Xing
2024-09-03 19:19 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-09-03 22:13 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-09-03 23:29 ` Jason Xing
2024-09-04 9:14 ` Jason Xing
2024-09-04 20:25 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-09-04 21:38 ` Jason Xing
2024-08-30 15:37 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] rxtimestamp.c: add the test for SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_RX_SOFTWARE_FILTER Jason Xing
2024-08-31 14:50 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-09-02 1:49 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-09-02 2:41 ` Jason Xing
2024-09-02 4:25 ` Philip Li
2024-09-02 5:04 ` Jason Xing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZtUZpPISIpChbcRq@rli9-mobl \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox