From: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@gmail.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Qianqiang Liu <qianqiang.liu@163.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: check the return value of the copy_from_sockptr
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 13:05:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZuH4B7STmaY0AI1m@mini-arch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZuHz9lSFY4dWD/4W@pop-os.localdomain>
On 09/11, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 11:49:32AM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > Can you explain what is not correct?
> >
> > Calling BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_GETSOCKOPT with max_optlen=0 should not be
> > a problem I think? (the buffer simply won't be accessible to the bpf prog)
>
> Sure. Sorry for not providing all the details.
>
> If I understand the behavior of copy_from_user() correctly, it may
> return partially copied data in case of error, which then leads to a
> partially-copied 'max_optlen'.
>
> So, do you expect a partially-copied max_optlen to be passed to the
> eBPF program meanwhile the user still expects a complete one (since no
> -EFAULT)?
>
> Thanks.
Partial copy is basically the same as user giving us garbage input, right?
That should still be handled correctly I think.
__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt (via sockopt_alloc_buf) should handle both cases correctly:
- garbage input / partial copy resulting in negative number -> EINVAL
- garbage input / partial copy resulting in too large number -> potentially
EFAULT when trying to copy PAGE_SIZE-worth of data
Also, for the EOPNOTSUPP case, we shouldn't even bother copying any data.
Am I missing something?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-11 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-11 5:04 [PATCH] net: check the return value of the copy_from_sockptr Qianqiang Liu
2024-09-11 6:51 ` D. Wythe
2024-09-11 7:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-09-11 8:23 ` Qianqiang Liu
2024-09-11 9:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-09-11 10:24 ` Qianqiang Liu
2024-09-11 12:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-09-11 16:58 ` Cong Wang
2024-09-11 17:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-09-11 17:35 ` Cong Wang
2024-09-11 18:49 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2024-09-11 19:48 ` Cong Wang
2024-09-11 20:05 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2024-09-14 0:49 ` Cong Wang
2024-09-14 18:01 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2024-09-18 13:11 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZuH4B7STmaY0AI1m@mini-arch \
--to=stfomichev@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=qianqiang.liu@163.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).