From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ganesha.gnumonks.org (ganesha.gnumonks.org [213.95.27.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2825E273FC; Wed, 11 Sep 2024 22:09:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.27.120 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726092594; cv=none; b=t9sRz2DVDpgwkiq2VV6R41bKUZSWcRbWDqepjZcV+VQdAFM5oPBWuIy9TzAGkgcvrq9U76KvgwdeJV0c8ajKaDiuuoCaoOUWH6qb5ukQc7tk/ceLTht35KuC/NVxNaIObjQYAFaaLA/qr7r/8zOV60ZeIxnTAmbnFk3OWhQmnjo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726092594; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9OplBb1J9BEoiWWRyL3mXvlZ4hshNQ4DEgndWzm+tKw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=YVUA8ceMePVp5xhleNhOK9lQQZzhMT8O72+ijzFxUfInj4Ip6Ye4/qq/IlPQ7RvRT57yuO4mtCCh2Dg8Ncr65EpZ02+RHWOPB7w+zm0XHcNWm1hv/iVyvHJeEs1VIhk2ZNfEpeuAcPNrcEwNuus7zLHbF3dRnLwq6ELjf+haU6Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnumonks.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.27.120 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnumonks.org Received: from [78.30.37.63] (port=54252 helo=gnumonks.org) by ganesha.gnumonks.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1soVWr-007WfA-Ii; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 00:09:39 +0200 Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 00:09:36 +0200 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Breno Leitao Cc: fw@strlen.de, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, rbc@meta.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next v5 0/2] netfilter: Make IP_NF_IPTABLES_LEGACY selectable Message-ID: References: <20240909084620.3155679-1-leitao@debian.org> <20240911-weightless-maize-ferret-5c23e1@devvm32600> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240911-weightless-maize-ferret-5c23e1@devvm32600> X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 08:25:52AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 01:46:17AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote: > > These two patches make IP_NF_IPTABLES_LEGACY and IP6_NF_IPTABLES_LEGACY > > Kconfigs user selectable, avoiding creating an extra dependency by > > enabling some other config that would select IP{6}_NF_IPTABLES_LEGACY. > > Any other feedback regarding this change? This is technically causing > user visible regression and blocks us from rolling out recent kernels. What regressions? This patch comes with no Fixes: tag.