From: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dsahern@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] net: fib_rules: Add DSCP selector support
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 15:08:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZuQ5VNo/VUBWbqNl@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240911093748.3662015-1-idosch@nvidia.com>
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 12:37:42PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> Currently, the kernel rejects IPv4 FIB rules that try to match on the
> upper three DSCP bits:
>
> # ip -4 rule add tos 0x1c table 100
> # ip -4 rule add tos 0x3c table 100
> Error: Invalid tos.
>
> The reason for that is that historically users of the FIB lookup API
> only populated the lower three DSCP bits in the TOS field of the IPv4
> flow key ('flowi4_tos'), which fits the TOS definition from the initial
> IPv4 specification (RFC 791).
>
> This is not very useful nowadays and instead some users want to be able
> to match on the six bits DSCP field, which replaced the TOS and IP
> precedence fields over 25 years ago (RFC 2474). In addition, the current
> behavior differs between IPv4 and IPv6 which does allow users to match
> on the entire DSCP field using the TOS selector.
>
> Recent patchsets made sure that callers of the FIB lookup API now
> populate the entire DSCP field in the IPv4 flow key. Therefore, it is
> now possible to extend FIB rules to match on DSCP.
>
> This is done by adding a new DSCP attribute which is implemented for
> both IPv4 and IPv6 to provide user space programs a consistent behavior
> between both address families.
>
> The behavior of the old TOS selector is unchanged and IPv4 FIB rules
> using it will only match on the lower three DSCP bits. The kernel will
> reject rules that try to use both selectors.
>
> Patch #1 adds the new DSCP attribute but rejects its usage.
>
> Patches #2-#3 implement IPv4 and IPv6 support.
>
> Patch #4 allows user space to use the new attribute.
>
> Patches #5-#6 add selftests.
>
> iproute2 changes can be found here [1].
>
> [1] https://github.com/idosch/iproute2/tree/submit/dscp_rfc_v1
Any reason for always printing numbers in the json output of this
iproute2 RFC? Why can't json users just use the -N parameter?
I haven't checked all the /etc/iproute2/rt_* aliases, but the general
behaviour seems to print the human readable name for both json and
normal outputs, unles -N is given on the command line.
> Ido Schimmel (6):
> net: fib_rules: Add DSCP selector attribute
> ipv4: fib_rules: Add DSCP selector support
> ipv6: fib_rules: Add DSCP selector support
> net: fib_rules: Enable DSCP selector usage
> selftests: fib_rule_tests: Add DSCP selector match tests
> selftests: fib_rule_tests: Add DSCP selector connect tests
>
> include/uapi/linux/fib_rules.h | 1 +
> net/core/fib_rules.c | 4 +-
> net/ipv4/fib_rules.c | 54 ++++++++++-
> net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c | 43 ++++++++-
> tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_rule_tests.sh | 90 +++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 184 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.46.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-13 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-11 9:37 [PATCH net-next 0/6] net: fib_rules: Add DSCP selector support Ido Schimmel
2024-09-11 9:37 ` [PATCH net-next 1/6] net: fib_rules: Add DSCP selector attribute Ido Schimmel
2024-09-13 12:03 ` Guillaume Nault
2024-09-11 9:37 ` [PATCH net-next 2/6] ipv4: fib_rules: Add DSCP selector support Ido Schimmel
2024-09-13 12:10 ` Guillaume Nault
2024-09-11 9:37 ` [PATCH net-next 3/6] ipv6: " Ido Schimmel
2024-09-13 12:21 ` Guillaume Nault
2024-09-11 9:37 ` [PATCH net-next 4/6] net: fib_rules: Enable DSCP selector usage Ido Schimmel
2024-09-13 12:26 ` Guillaume Nault
2024-09-11 9:37 ` [PATCH net-next 5/6] selftests: fib_rule_tests: Add DSCP selector match tests Ido Schimmel
2024-09-13 12:52 ` Guillaume Nault
2024-09-11 9:37 ` [PATCH net-next 6/6] selftests: fib_rule_tests: Add DSCP selector connect tests Ido Schimmel
2024-09-13 12:58 ` Guillaume Nault
2024-09-13 13:08 ` Guillaume Nault [this message]
2024-09-30 13:45 ` [PATCH net-next 0/6] net: fib_rules: Add DSCP selector support Ido Schimmel
2024-09-30 18:18 ` David Ahern
2024-10-01 20:08 ` Guillaume Nault
2024-09-13 14:31 ` David Ahern
2024-09-14 4:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZuQ5VNo/VUBWbqNl@debian \
--to=gnault@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox