From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ganesha.gnumonks.org (ganesha.gnumonks.org [213.95.27.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66B8B176248; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 11:21:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.27.120 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726658474; cv=none; b=XAaH3sNBRh0aEt0vXBbggs0mcEjxT//6YGuG2UTObrq/YpziH+dSY1wYhaeE3cL4sNwzh9oncySk4NeU/RZ1KA2O/lPD7xATcwILjaqXHPfNwDQB2nMgZcNTMIE0G1bGFcThaMLucSRUG7voB7eivnRV8FIx/w1bkkJ7zs5GdvM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726658474; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rhyNmR8hAjJ9SSA7CFA1s3XYnMcGfkB27v3q2tu/ZaY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=H7ewy8gB1QqVVyjQQjNZ/fMDpLOHH7Ng/Z07DdAfnWM47uQStJEtJuzlR2aPo0+MhFqN4v0X2WzEh1G7Ua4aTvmsGeK1F1KS9khoxGvQvrvLjn5KXvos465xTPsX7FGU8hGGEVeV5qn3Rf+EBuZycgGJMWYWZuqJIFOWB5YhEEs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnumonks.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.27.120 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnumonks.org Received: from [78.30.37.63] (port=49978 helo=gnumonks.org) by ganesha.gnumonks.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sqsk3-001Kge-3o; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 13:21:07 +0200 Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 13:21:02 +0200 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Breno Leitao Cc: fw@strlen.de, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, rbc@meta.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next v5 0/2] netfilter: Make IP_NF_IPTABLES_LEGACY selectable Message-ID: References: <20240909084620.3155679-1-leitao@debian.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 01:13:32PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 01:46:17AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote: > > These two patches make IP_NF_IPTABLES_LEGACY and IP6_NF_IPTABLES_LEGACY > > Kconfigs user selectable, avoiding creating an extra dependency by > > enabling some other config that would select IP{6}_NF_IPTABLES_LEGACY. > > This needs a v6. There is also: > > BRIDGE_NF_EBTABLES_LEGACY > > We have more copy and paste in the bridge. > > Would you submit a single patch covering this too? There is also: # ARP tables config IP_NF_ARPTABLES tristate which has never had a description. Could you also add? arptables is a legacy packet classification. This is not needed if you are using arptables over nftables (iptables-nft). There is no need for _LEGACY in this case. Single patch to update them all should be fine. Thanks