From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Qingtao Cao <qingtao.cao.au@gmail.com>
Cc: Qingtao Cao <qingtao.cao@digi.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/1] net: phy: marvell: avoid bringing down fibre link when autoneg is bypassed
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 10:19:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zv5hrvOspTcYuQYs@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241003071050.376502-1-qingtao.cao@digi.com>
On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 05:10:50PM +1000, Qingtao Cao wrote:
> On 88E151x the SGMII autoneg bypass mode defaults to be enabled. When it is
> activated, the device assumes a link-up status with existing configuration
> in BMCR, avoid bringing down the fibre link in this case
>
> Test case:
> 1. Two 88E151x connected with SFP, both enable autoneg, link is up with
> speed 1000M
> 2. Disable autoneg on one device and explicitly set its speed to 1000M
> 3. The fibre link can still up with this change, otherwise not.
As you're clearly using fibre, there's this chunk of code in the same
function that is (IMHO) wrong:
if (phydev->duplex == DUPLEX_FULL) {
if (!(lpa & LPA_PAUSE_FIBER)) {
phydev->pause = 0;
phydev->asym_pause = 0;
} else if ((lpa & LPA_PAUSE_ASYM_FIBER)) {
phydev->pause = 1;
phydev->asym_pause = 1;
} else {
phydev->pause = 1;
phydev->asym_pause = 0;
}
}
as ->pause and ->asym_pause are supposed to be the _resolved_
state, and this is only looking at the link partner's state.
fiber_lpa_mod_linkmode_lpa_t() also uses the baseT linkmodes for
Fibre.
IMHO, this should be:
mii_lpa_mod_linkmode_x(phydev->lp_advertising, lpa,
ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseX_Full_BIT);
phy_resolve_aneg_pause(phydev);
Please can you test whether that works correctly in addition to
your other fix? Thanks.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-03 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-03 7:10 [PATCH net-next v3 1/1] net: phy: marvell: avoid bringing down fibre link when autoneg is bypassed Qingtao Cao
2024-10-03 7:42 ` Mateusz Polchlopek
2024-10-03 9:19 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2024-10-03 12:40 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zv5hrvOspTcYuQYs@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=qingtao.cao.au@gmail.com \
--cc=qingtao.cao@digi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).