From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <jv@jvosburgh.net>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bonding: show slave priority in proc info
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 00:37:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZvIJ1xewGuJ_JhbE@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89iLoVexJpUbZzwAYtGpLiTZ36tFh5GpJU=mYH6YazJeTPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Eric,
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 09:45:23AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 9:29 AM Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > The slave priority is currently not shown in the proc filesystem, which
> > prevents users from retrieving this information via proc. This patch fixes
> > the issue by printing the slave priority in the proc filesystem, making it
> > accessible to users.
> >
> > Fixes: 0a2ff7cc8ad4 ("Bonding: add per-port priority for failover re-selection")
> > Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/bonding/bond_procfs.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_procfs.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_procfs.c
> > index 7edf72ec816a..8b8580956edd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_procfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_procfs.c
> > @@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ static void bond_info_show_slave(struct seq_file *seq,
> > seq_printf(seq, "Permanent HW addr: %*phC\n",
> > slave->dev->addr_len, slave->perm_hwaddr);
> > seq_printf(seq, "Slave queue ID: %d\n", READ_ONCE(slave->queue_id));
> > + seq_printf(seq, "Slave prio: %d\n", READ_ONCE(slave->prio));
> >
> > if (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD) {
> > const struct port *port = &SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave)->port;
> > --
> > 2.46.0
> >
>
> proc interface is deprecated in favor of rtnl.
>
> slave->prio is correctly reported in IFLA_BOND_SLAVE_PRIO attribute.
>
> No further kernel change is needed.
Thanks for the reply. Some users said they still prefer to use /proc
to get the bonding info as it's easier compared with get info via rtnl(ip
link). I'm OK to drop this patch.
Thanks
Hangbin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-24 0:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-23 7:28 [PATCH net] bonding: show slave priority in proc info Hangbin Liu
2024-09-23 7:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-09-24 0:37 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZvIJ1xewGuJ_JhbE@fedora \
--to=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).