Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com>
To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, vladimir.oltean@nxp.com,
	claudiu.manoil@nxp.com, xiaoning.wang@nxp.com,
	christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
	bhelgaas@google.com, horms@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 10/13] net: enetc: extract enetc_int_vector_init/destroy() from enetc_alloc_msix()
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 12:53:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zw6eD6/KG2ufNr/G@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241015125841.1075560-11-wei.fang@nxp.com>

On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 08:58:38PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> From: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
>
> Extract enetc_int_vector_init() and enetc_int_vector_destroy() from
> enetc_alloc_msix() so that the code is more concise and readable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> ---
> v2 changes:
> This patch is separated from v1 patch 9 ("net: enetc: optimize the
> allocation of tx_bdr"). Separate enetc_int_vector_init() from the
> original patch. In addition, add new help function
> enetc_int_vector_destroy().
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c | 174 +++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> index 032d8eadd003..d36af3f8ba31 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> @@ -2965,6 +2965,87 @@ int enetc_ioctl(struct net_device *ndev, struct ifreq *rq, int cmd)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_ioctl);
>
> +static int enetc_int_vector_init(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv, int i,
> +				 int v_tx_rings)
> +{
> +	struct enetc_int_vector *v __free(kfree);

Old code have not use cleanup. Please keep exact same as old codes.
Or you should mention at commit log at least.

Frank

> +	struct enetc_bdr *bdr;
> +	int j, err;
> +
> +	v = kzalloc(struct_size(v, tx_ring, v_tx_rings), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!v)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	bdr = &v->rx_ring;
> +	bdr->index = i;
> +	bdr->ndev = priv->ndev;
> +	bdr->dev = priv->dev;
> +	bdr->bd_count = priv->rx_bd_count;
> +	bdr->buffer_offset = ENETC_RXB_PAD;
> +	priv->rx_ring[i] = bdr;
> +
> +	err = xdp_rxq_info_reg(&bdr->xdp.rxq, priv->ndev, i, 0);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	err = xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(&bdr->xdp.rxq,
> +					 MEM_TYPE_PAGE_SHARED, NULL);
> +	if (err) {
> +		xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&bdr->xdp.rxq);
> +		return err;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* init defaults for adaptive IC */
> +	if (priv->ic_mode & ENETC_IC_RX_ADAPTIVE) {
> +		v->rx_ictt = 0x1;
> +		v->rx_dim_en = true;
> +	}
> +
> +	INIT_WORK(&v->rx_dim.work, enetc_rx_dim_work);
> +	netif_napi_add(priv->ndev, &v->napi, enetc_poll);
> +	v->count_tx_rings = v_tx_rings;
> +
> +	for (j = 0; j < v_tx_rings; j++) {
> +		int idx;
> +
> +		/* default tx ring mapping policy */
> +		idx = priv->bdr_int_num * j + i;
> +		__set_bit(idx, &v->tx_rings_map);
> +		bdr = &v->tx_ring[j];
> +		bdr->index = idx;
> +		bdr->ndev = priv->ndev;
> +		bdr->dev = priv->dev;
> +		bdr->bd_count = priv->tx_bd_count;
> +		priv->tx_ring[idx] = bdr;
> +	}
> +
> +	priv->int_vector[i] = no_free_ptr(v);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc_int_vector_destroy(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv, int i)
> +{
> +	struct enetc_int_vector *v = priv->int_vector[i];
> +	struct enetc_bdr *rx_ring = &v->rx_ring;
> +	int j, tx_ring_index;
> +
> +	xdp_rxq_info_unreg_mem_model(&rx_ring->xdp.rxq);
> +	xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rx_ring->xdp.rxq);
> +	netif_napi_del(&v->napi);
> +	cancel_work_sync(&v->rx_dim.work);
> +
> +	priv->rx_ring[i] = NULL;
> +
> +	for (j = 0; j < v->count_tx_rings; j++) {
> +		tx_ring_index = priv->bdr_int_num * j + i;
> +		priv->tx_ring[tx_ring_index] = NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	kfree(v);
> +	priv->int_vector[i] = NULL;
> +}
> +
>  int enetc_alloc_msix(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
>  {
>  	struct pci_dev *pdev = priv->si->pdev;
> @@ -2986,64 +3067,9 @@ int enetc_alloc_msix(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
>  	/* # of tx rings per int vector */
>  	v_tx_rings = priv->num_tx_rings / priv->bdr_int_num;
>
> -	for (i = 0; i < priv->bdr_int_num; i++) {
> -		struct enetc_int_vector *v;
> -		struct enetc_bdr *bdr;
> -		int j;
> -
> -		v = kzalloc(struct_size(v, tx_ring, v_tx_rings), GFP_KERNEL);
> -		if (!v) {
> -			err = -ENOMEM;
> +	for (i = 0; i < priv->bdr_int_num; i++)
> +		if (enetc_int_vector_init(priv, i, v_tx_rings))
>  			goto fail;
> -		}
> -
> -		priv->int_vector[i] = v;
> -
> -		bdr = &v->rx_ring;
> -		bdr->index = i;
> -		bdr->ndev = priv->ndev;
> -		bdr->dev = priv->dev;
> -		bdr->bd_count = priv->rx_bd_count;
> -		bdr->buffer_offset = ENETC_RXB_PAD;
> -		priv->rx_ring[i] = bdr;
> -
> -		err = xdp_rxq_info_reg(&bdr->xdp.rxq, priv->ndev, i, 0);
> -		if (err) {
> -			kfree(v);
> -			goto fail;
> -		}
> -
> -		err = xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(&bdr->xdp.rxq,
> -						 MEM_TYPE_PAGE_SHARED, NULL);
> -		if (err) {
> -			xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&bdr->xdp.rxq);
> -			kfree(v);
> -			goto fail;
> -		}
> -
> -		/* init defaults for adaptive IC */
> -		if (priv->ic_mode & ENETC_IC_RX_ADAPTIVE) {
> -			v->rx_ictt = 0x1;
> -			v->rx_dim_en = true;
> -		}
> -		INIT_WORK(&v->rx_dim.work, enetc_rx_dim_work);
> -		netif_napi_add(priv->ndev, &v->napi, enetc_poll);
> -		v->count_tx_rings = v_tx_rings;
> -
> -		for (j = 0; j < v_tx_rings; j++) {
> -			int idx;
> -
> -			/* default tx ring mapping policy */
> -			idx = priv->bdr_int_num * j + i;
> -			__set_bit(idx, &v->tx_rings_map);
> -			bdr = &v->tx_ring[j];
> -			bdr->index = idx;
> -			bdr->ndev = priv->ndev;
> -			bdr->dev = priv->dev;
> -			bdr->bd_count = priv->tx_bd_count;
> -			priv->tx_ring[idx] = bdr;
> -		}
> -	}
>
>  	num_stack_tx_queues = enetc_num_stack_tx_queues(priv);
>
> @@ -3062,16 +3088,8 @@ int enetc_alloc_msix(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
>  	return 0;
>
>  fail:
> -	while (i--) {
> -		struct enetc_int_vector *v = priv->int_vector[i];
> -		struct enetc_bdr *rx_ring = &v->rx_ring;
> -
> -		xdp_rxq_info_unreg_mem_model(&rx_ring->xdp.rxq);
> -		xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rx_ring->xdp.rxq);
> -		netif_napi_del(&v->napi);
> -		cancel_work_sync(&v->rx_dim.work);
> -		kfree(v);
> -	}
> +	while (i--)
> +		enetc_int_vector_destroy(priv, i);
>
>  	pci_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
>
> @@ -3083,26 +3101,8 @@ void enetc_free_msix(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
>  {
>  	int i;
>
> -	for (i = 0; i < priv->bdr_int_num; i++) {
> -		struct enetc_int_vector *v = priv->int_vector[i];
> -		struct enetc_bdr *rx_ring = &v->rx_ring;
> -
> -		xdp_rxq_info_unreg_mem_model(&rx_ring->xdp.rxq);
> -		xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rx_ring->xdp.rxq);
> -		netif_napi_del(&v->napi);
> -		cancel_work_sync(&v->rx_dim.work);
> -	}
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < priv->num_rx_rings; i++)
> -		priv->rx_ring[i] = NULL;
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < priv->num_tx_rings; i++)
> -		priv->tx_ring[i] = NULL;
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < priv->bdr_int_num; i++) {
> -		kfree(priv->int_vector[i]);
> -		priv->int_vector[i] = NULL;
> -	}
> +	for (i = 0; i < priv->bdr_int_num; i++)
> +		enetc_int_vector_destroy(priv, i);
>
>  	/* disable all MSIX for this device */
>  	pci_free_irq_vectors(priv->si->pdev);
> --
> 2.34.1
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-15 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-15 12:58 [PATCH v2 net-next 00/13] add basic support for i.MX95 NETC Wei Fang
2024-10-15 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 01/13] dt-bindings: net: add compatible string for i.MX95 EMDIO Wei Fang
2024-10-15 15:33   ` Frank Li
2024-10-15 21:56   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-10-15 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 02/13] dt-bindings: net: add i.MX95 ENETC support Wei Fang
2024-10-15 15:40   ` Frank Li
2024-10-16  1:21     ` Wei Fang
2024-10-15 21:58   ` Rob Herring
2024-10-16  2:06     ` Wei Fang
2024-10-15 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 03/13] dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC blocks control Wei Fang
2024-10-15 15:45   ` Frank Li
2024-10-16  1:22     ` Wei Fang
2024-10-15 22:02   ` Rob Herring
2024-10-16  2:03     ` Wei Fang
2024-10-15 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 04/13] net: enetc: add initial netc-blk-ctrl driver support Wei Fang
2024-10-15 16:13   ` Frank Li
2024-10-16  1:30     ` Wei Fang
2024-10-15 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 05/13] net: enetc: move some common interfaces to enetc_pf_common.c Wei Fang
2024-10-15 16:24   ` Frank Li
2024-10-16  1:33     ` Wei Fang
2024-10-15 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 06/13] net: enetc: build enetc_pf_common.c as a separate module Wei Fang
2024-10-15 16:35   ` Frank Li
2024-10-16  1:47     ` Wei Fang
2024-10-15 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 07/13] net: enetc: only enable ERR050089 workaround on LS1028A Wei Fang
2024-10-15 16:41   ` Frank Li
2024-10-15 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 08/13] PCI: Add NXP NETC vendor ID and device IDs Wei Fang
2024-10-15 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 09/13] net: enetc: add i.MX95 EMDIO support Wei Fang
2024-10-15 16:49   ` Frank Li
2024-10-15 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 10/13] net: enetc: extract enetc_int_vector_init/destroy() from enetc_alloc_msix() Wei Fang
2024-10-15 16:33   ` Claudiu Manoil
2024-10-16  5:34     ` Wei Fang
2024-10-15 16:53   ` Frank Li [this message]
2024-10-16  1:50     ` Wei Fang
2024-10-16  7:29   ` Simon Horman
2024-10-16  7:38     ` Wei Fang
2024-10-15 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 11/13] net: enetc: optimize the allocation of tx_bdr Wei Fang
2024-10-15 16:37   ` Claudiu Manoil
2024-10-15 16:58   ` Frank Li
2024-10-16  1:53     ` Wei Fang
2024-10-15 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 12/13] net: enetc: add preliminary support for i.MX95 ENETC PF Wei Fang
2024-10-15 18:37   ` Frank Li
2024-10-16  3:12     ` Wei Fang
2024-10-15 12:58 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 13/13] MAINTAINERS: update ENETC driver files and maintainers Wei Fang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zw6eD6/KG2ufNr/G@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810 \
    --to=frank.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    --cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
    --cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox