Re: [PATCH net-next 08/12] net: pse-pd: pd692x0: Add support for PSE PI priority feature

[Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>]

On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 01:41:02AM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > +	msg = pd692x0_msg_template_list[PD692X0_MSG_SET_PORT_PARAM];
> > +	msg.sub[2] = id;
> > +	/* Controller priority from 1 to 3 */
> > +	msg.data[4] = prio + 1;
> 
> Does 0 have a meaning? It just seems an odd design if it does not.

0 is not documented. But there are sub-priority which are not directly
configured by user, but affect the system behavior.

Priority#: Critical – 1; high – 2; low – 3
 For ports with the same priority, the PoE Controller sets the
 sub-priority according to the logic port number. (Lower number gets
 higher priority).

Port priority affects:
1. Power-up order: After a reset, the ports are powered up according to
 their priority, highest to lowest, highest priority will power up first.
2. Shutdown order: When exceeding the power budget, lowest priority
 ports will turn off first.

Should we return sub priorities on the prio get request?

If i see it correctly, even if user do not actively configures priorities,
they are always present. For example port 0 will have always a Prio
higher than Port 10.

Regards,
Oleksij
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |