From: Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com>
To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, vladimir.oltean@nxp.com,
claudiu.manoil@nxp.com, xiaoning.wang@nxp.com,
christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
bhelgaas@google.com, horms@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 10/13] net: enetc: extract enetc_int_vector_init/destroy() from enetc_alloc_msix()
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 12:42:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZxE+W7pHypGN7KYl@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241017074637.1265584-11-wei.fang@nxp.com>
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 03:46:34PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> From: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
>
> Extract enetc_int_vector_init() and enetc_int_vector_destroy() from
> enetc_alloc_msix() so that the code is more concise and readable. In
> addition, slightly different from before, the cleanup helper function
> is used to manage dynamically allocated memory resources.
>
> Signed-off-by: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> ---
> v2 changes:
> This patch is separated from v1 patch 9 ("net: enetc: optimize the
> allocation of tx_bdr"). Separate enetc_int_vector_init() from the
> original patch. In addition, add new help function
> enetc_int_vector_destroy().
> v3 changes:
> 1. Add the description of cleanup helper function used
> enetc_int_vector_init() to the commit message.
> 2. Fix the 'err' uninitialized issue when enetc_int_vector_init()
> returns error.
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c | 172 ++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> index 032d8eadd003..bd725561b8a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> @@ -2965,6 +2965,87 @@ int enetc_ioctl(struct net_device *ndev, struct ifreq *rq, int cmd)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_ioctl);
>
> +static int enetc_int_vector_init(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv, int i,
> + int v_tx_rings)
> +{
> + struct enetc_int_vector *v __free(kfree);
> + struct enetc_bdr *bdr;
> + int j, err;
> +
> + v = kzalloc(struct_size(v, tx_ring, v_tx_rings), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!v)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + bdr = &v->rx_ring;
> + bdr->index = i;
> + bdr->ndev = priv->ndev;
> + bdr->dev = priv->dev;
> + bdr->bd_count = priv->rx_bd_count;
> + bdr->buffer_offset = ENETC_RXB_PAD;
> + priv->rx_ring[i] = bdr;
> +
> + err = xdp_rxq_info_reg(&bdr->xdp.rxq, priv->ndev, i, 0);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + err = xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(&bdr->xdp.rxq,
> + MEM_TYPE_PAGE_SHARED, NULL);
> + if (err) {
> + xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&bdr->xdp.rxq);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + /* init defaults for adaptive IC */
> + if (priv->ic_mode & ENETC_IC_RX_ADAPTIVE) {
> + v->rx_ictt = 0x1;
> + v->rx_dim_en = true;
> + }
> +
> + INIT_WORK(&v->rx_dim.work, enetc_rx_dim_work);
> + netif_napi_add(priv->ndev, &v->napi, enetc_poll);
> + v->count_tx_rings = v_tx_rings;
> +
> + for (j = 0; j < v_tx_rings; j++) {
> + int idx;
> +
> + /* default tx ring mapping policy */
> + idx = priv->bdr_int_num * j + i;
> + __set_bit(idx, &v->tx_rings_map);
> + bdr = &v->tx_ring[j];
> + bdr->index = idx;
> + bdr->ndev = priv->ndev;
> + bdr->dev = priv->dev;
> + bdr->bd_count = priv->tx_bd_count;
> + priv->tx_ring[idx] = bdr;
> + }
> +
> + priv->int_vector[i] = no_free_ptr(v);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void enetc_int_vector_destroy(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv, int i)
> +{
> + struct enetc_int_vector *v = priv->int_vector[i];
> + struct enetc_bdr *rx_ring = &v->rx_ring;
> + int j, tx_ring_index;
> +
> + xdp_rxq_info_unreg_mem_model(&rx_ring->xdp.rxq);
> + xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rx_ring->xdp.rxq);
> + netif_napi_del(&v->napi);
> + cancel_work_sync(&v->rx_dim.work);
> +
> + priv->rx_ring[i] = NULL;
> +
> + for (j = 0; j < v->count_tx_rings; j++) {
> + tx_ring_index = priv->bdr_int_num * j + i;
> + priv->tx_ring[tx_ring_index] = NULL;
> + }
> +
> + kfree(v);
> + priv->int_vector[i] = NULL;
> +}
> +
> int enetc_alloc_msix(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
> {
> struct pci_dev *pdev = priv->si->pdev;
> @@ -2987,62 +3068,9 @@ int enetc_alloc_msix(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
> v_tx_rings = priv->num_tx_rings / priv->bdr_int_num;
>
> for (i = 0; i < priv->bdr_int_num; i++) {
> - struct enetc_int_vector *v;
> - struct enetc_bdr *bdr;
> - int j;
> -
> - v = kzalloc(struct_size(v, tx_ring, v_tx_rings), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!v) {
> - err = -ENOMEM;
> - goto fail;
> - }
> -
> - priv->int_vector[i] = v;
> -
> - bdr = &v->rx_ring;
> - bdr->index = i;
> - bdr->ndev = priv->ndev;
> - bdr->dev = priv->dev;
> - bdr->bd_count = priv->rx_bd_count;
> - bdr->buffer_offset = ENETC_RXB_PAD;
> - priv->rx_ring[i] = bdr;
> -
> - err = xdp_rxq_info_reg(&bdr->xdp.rxq, priv->ndev, i, 0);
> - if (err) {
> - kfree(v);
> - goto fail;
> - }
> -
> - err = xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(&bdr->xdp.rxq,
> - MEM_TYPE_PAGE_SHARED, NULL);
> - if (err) {
> - xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&bdr->xdp.rxq);
> - kfree(v);
> + err = enetc_int_vector_init(priv, i, v_tx_rings);
> + if (err)
> goto fail;
> - }
> -
> - /* init defaults for adaptive IC */
> - if (priv->ic_mode & ENETC_IC_RX_ADAPTIVE) {
> - v->rx_ictt = 0x1;
> - v->rx_dim_en = true;
> - }
> - INIT_WORK(&v->rx_dim.work, enetc_rx_dim_work);
> - netif_napi_add(priv->ndev, &v->napi, enetc_poll);
> - v->count_tx_rings = v_tx_rings;
> -
> - for (j = 0; j < v_tx_rings; j++) {
> - int idx;
> -
> - /* default tx ring mapping policy */
> - idx = priv->bdr_int_num * j + i;
> - __set_bit(idx, &v->tx_rings_map);
> - bdr = &v->tx_ring[j];
> - bdr->index = idx;
> - bdr->ndev = priv->ndev;
> - bdr->dev = priv->dev;
> - bdr->bd_count = priv->tx_bd_count;
> - priv->tx_ring[idx] = bdr;
> - }
> }
>
> num_stack_tx_queues = enetc_num_stack_tx_queues(priv);
> @@ -3062,16 +3090,8 @@ int enetc_alloc_msix(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
> return 0;
>
> fail:
> - while (i--) {
> - struct enetc_int_vector *v = priv->int_vector[i];
> - struct enetc_bdr *rx_ring = &v->rx_ring;
> -
> - xdp_rxq_info_unreg_mem_model(&rx_ring->xdp.rxq);
> - xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rx_ring->xdp.rxq);
> - netif_napi_del(&v->napi);
> - cancel_work_sync(&v->rx_dim.work);
> - kfree(v);
> - }
> + while (i--)
> + enetc_int_vector_destroy(priv, i);
>
> pci_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
>
> @@ -3083,26 +3103,8 @@ void enetc_free_msix(struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv)
> {
> int i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < priv->bdr_int_num; i++) {
> - struct enetc_int_vector *v = priv->int_vector[i];
> - struct enetc_bdr *rx_ring = &v->rx_ring;
> -
> - xdp_rxq_info_unreg_mem_model(&rx_ring->xdp.rxq);
> - xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rx_ring->xdp.rxq);
> - netif_napi_del(&v->napi);
> - cancel_work_sync(&v->rx_dim.work);
> - }
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < priv->num_rx_rings; i++)
> - priv->rx_ring[i] = NULL;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < priv->num_tx_rings; i++)
> - priv->tx_ring[i] = NULL;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < priv->bdr_int_num; i++) {
> - kfree(priv->int_vector[i]);
> - priv->int_vector[i] = NULL;
> - }
> + for (i = 0; i < priv->bdr_int_num; i++)
> + enetc_int_vector_destroy(priv, i);
>
> /* disable all MSIX for this device */
> pci_free_irq_vectors(priv->si->pdev);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-17 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-17 7:46 [PATCH v3 net-next 00/13] add basic support for i.MX95 NETC Wei Fang
2024-10-17 7:46 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 01/13] dt-bindings: net: add compatible string for i.MX95 EMDIO Wei Fang
2024-10-17 7:46 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 02/13] dt-bindings: net: add i.MX95 ENETC support Wei Fang
2024-10-17 16:23 ` Frank Li
2024-10-18 1:20 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-18 6:52 ` Alexander Stein
2024-10-18 7:50 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-18 11:39 ` Alexander Stein
2024-10-19 9:58 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-18 13:09 ` Rob Herring
2024-10-19 9:58 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-17 7:46 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 03/13] dt-bindings: net: add bindings for NETC blocks control Wei Fang
2024-10-17 16:27 ` Frank Li
2024-10-18 1:22 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-17 7:46 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 04/13] net: enetc: add initial netc-blk-ctrl driver support Wei Fang
2024-10-17 16:33 ` Frank Li
2024-10-18 1:23 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-17 7:46 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 05/13] net: enetc: extract common ENETC PF parts for LS1028A and i.MX95 platforms Wei Fang
2024-10-17 16:34 ` Frank Li
2024-10-17 7:46 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 06/13] net: enetc: build enetc_pf_common.c as a separate module Wei Fang
2024-10-17 16:39 ` Frank Li
2024-10-18 1:30 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-18 21:09 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-19 9:43 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-17 7:46 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 07/13] net: enetc: remove ERR050089 workaround for i.MX95 Wei Fang
2024-10-17 16:40 ` Frank Li
2024-10-17 7:46 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 08/13] PCI: Add NXP NETC vendor ID and device IDs Wei Fang
2024-10-17 7:46 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 09/13] net: enetc: add i.MX95 EMDIO support Wei Fang
2024-10-17 7:46 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 10/13] net: enetc: extract enetc_int_vector_init/destroy() from enetc_alloc_msix() Wei Fang
2024-10-17 16:42 ` Frank Li [this message]
2024-10-17 7:46 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 11/13] net: enetc: optimize the allocation of tx_bdr Wei Fang
2024-10-17 7:46 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 12/13] net: enetc: add preliminary support for i.MX95 ENETC PF Wei Fang
2024-10-17 16:59 ` Frank Li
2024-10-18 2:04 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-18 3:05 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-18 18:10 ` Frank Li
2024-10-19 10:22 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-17 18:30 ` Claudiu Manoil
2024-10-18 2:18 ` Wei Fang
2024-10-17 7:46 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 13/13] MAINTAINERS: update ENETC driver files and maintainers Wei Fang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZxE+W7pHypGN7KYl@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810 \
--to=frank.li@nxp.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
--cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
--cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox