From: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@marvell.com>
To: Furong Xu <0x1207@gmail.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>, <xfr@outlook.com>,
Suraj Jaiswal <quic_jsuraj@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1] net: stmmac: TSO: Fix unbalanced DMA map/unmap for non-paged SKB data
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 14:34:53 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZxYZNc+CKWglUphG@test-OptiPlex-Tower-Plus-7010> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241021061023.2162701-1-0x1207@gmail.com>
On 2024-10-21 at 11:40:23, Furong Xu (0x1207@gmail.com) wrote:
> In case the non-paged data of a SKB carries protocol header and protocol
> payload to be transmitted on a certain platform that the DMA AXI address
> width is configured to 40-bit/48-bit, or the size of the non-paged data
> is bigger than TSO_MAX_BUFF_SIZE on a certain platform that the DMA AXI
> address width is configured to 32-bit, then this SKB requires at least
> two DMA transmit descriptors to serve it.
>
> For example, three descriptors are allocated to split one DMA buffer
> mapped from one piece of non-paged data:
> dma_desc[N + 0],
> dma_desc[N + 1],
> dma_desc[N + 2].
> Then three elements of tx_q->tx_skbuff_dma[] will be allocated to hold
> extra information to be reused in stmmac_tx_clean():
> tx_q->tx_skbuff_dma[N + 0],
> tx_q->tx_skbuff_dma[N + 1],
> tx_q->tx_skbuff_dma[N + 2].
> Now we focus on tx_q->tx_skbuff_dma[entry].buf, which is the DMA buffer
> address returned by DMA mapping call. stmmac_tx_clean() will try to
> unmap the DMA buffer _ONLY_IF_ tx_q->tx_skbuff_dma[entry].buf
> is a valid buffer address.
>
> The expected behavior that saves DMA buffer address of this non-paged
> data to tx_q->tx_skbuff_dma[entry].buf is:
> tx_q->tx_skbuff_dma[N + 0].buf = NULL;
> tx_q->tx_skbuff_dma[N + 1].buf = NULL;
> tx_q->tx_skbuff_dma[N + 2].buf = dma_map_single();
> Unfortunately, the current code misbehaves like this:
> tx_q->tx_skbuff_dma[N + 0].buf = dma_map_single();
> tx_q->tx_skbuff_dma[N + 1].buf = NULL;
> tx_q->tx_skbuff_dma[N + 2].buf = NULL;
>
> On the stmmac_tx_clean() side, when dma_desc[N + 0] is closed by the
> DMA engine, tx_q->tx_skbuff_dma[N + 0].buf is a valid buffer address
> obviously, then the DMA buffer will be unmapped immediately.
> There may be a rare case that the DMA engine does not finish the
> pending dma_desc[N + 1], dma_desc[N + 2] yet. Now things will go
> horribly wrong, DMA is going to access a unmapped/unreferenced memory
> region, corrupted data will be transmited or iommu fault will be
> triggered :(
>
> In contrast, the for-loop that maps SKB fragments behaves perfectly
> as expected, and that is how the driver should do for both non-paged
> data and paged frags actually.
>
> This patch corrects DMA map/unmap sequences by fixing the array index
> for tx_q->tx_skbuff_dma[entry].buf when assigning DMA buffer address.
>
> Tested and verified on DWXGMAC CORE 3.20a
>
> Reported-by: Suraj Jaiswal <quic_jsuraj@quicinc.com>
> Fixes: f748be531d70 ("stmmac: support new GMAC4")
> Signed-off-by: Furong Xu <0x1207@gmail.com>
> ---
> .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 22 ++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> index d3895d7eecfc..208dbc68aaf9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> @@ -4304,11 +4304,6 @@ static netdev_tx_t stmmac_tso_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> if (dma_mapping_error(priv->device, des))
> goto dma_map_err;
>
> - tx_q->tx_skbuff_dma[first_entry].buf = des;
> - tx_q->tx_skbuff_dma[first_entry].len = skb_headlen(skb);
> - tx_q->tx_skbuff_dma[first_entry].map_as_page = false;
> - tx_q->tx_skbuff_dma[first_entry].buf_type = STMMAC_TXBUF_T_SKB;
> -
> if (priv->dma_cap.addr64 <= 32) {
> first->des0 = cpu_to_le32(des);
>
> @@ -4327,6 +4322,23 @@ static netdev_tx_t stmmac_tso_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>
> stmmac_tso_allocator(priv, des, tmp_pay_len, (nfrags == 0), queue);
>
> + /* In case two or more DMA transmit descriptors are allocated for this
> + * non-paged SKB data, the DMA buffer address should be saved to
> + * tx_q->tx_skbuff_dma[].buf corresponding to the last descriptor,
> + * and leave the other tx_q->tx_skbuff_dma[].buf as NULL to guarantee
> + * that stmmac_tx_clean() does not unmap the entire DMA buffer too early
> + * since the tail areas of the DMA buffer can be accessed by DMA engine
> + * sooner or later.
> + * By saving the DMA buffer address to tx_q->tx_skbuff_dma[].buf
> + * corresponding to the last descriptor, stmmac_tx_clean() will unmap
> + * this DMA buffer right after the DMA engine completely finishes the
> + * full buffer transmission.
> + */
> + tx_q->tx_skbuff_dma[tx_q->cur_tx].buf = des;
> + tx_q->tx_skbuff_dma[tx_q->cur_tx].len = skb_headlen(skb);
> + tx_q->tx_skbuff_dma[tx_q->cur_tx].map_as_page = false;
> + tx_q->tx_skbuff_dma[tx_q->cur_tx].buf_type = STMMAC_TXBUF_T_SKB;
> +
> /* Prepare fragments */
> for (i = 0; i < nfrags; i++) {
> const skb_frag_t *frag = &skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[i];
> --
Reviewed-by: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@marvell.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-21 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-21 6:10 [PATCH net v1] net: stmmac: TSO: Fix unbalanced DMA map/unmap for non-paged SKB data Furong Xu
2024-10-21 9:04 ` Hariprasad Kelam [this message]
2024-10-21 12:26 ` Simon Horman
2024-10-29 10:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2024-11-27 18:39 ` Jon Hunter
2024-11-28 6:45 ` Furong Xu
2024-12-03 0:33 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-12-03 2:03 ` Furong Xu
2024-12-03 2:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-12-03 3:16 ` Furong Xu
2024-12-04 13:57 ` Thierry Reding
2024-12-04 14:06 ` Robin Murphy
2024-12-04 15:58 ` Thierry Reding
2024-12-04 16:39 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-12-04 17:02 ` Jon Hunter
2024-12-04 17:45 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-12-04 18:18 ` Thierry Reding
2024-12-05 10:57 ` Jon Hunter
2024-12-05 11:02 ` Jon Hunter
2024-12-05 9:34 ` Furong Xu
2024-12-04 17:03 ` Jon Hunter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZxYZNc+CKWglUphG@test-OptiPlex-Tower-Plus-7010 \
--to=hkelam@marvell.com \
--cc=0x1207@gmail.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=quic_jsuraj@quicinc.com \
--cc=xfr@outlook.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox