From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] net: pcs: xpcs: yet more cleanups
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 09:59:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZxdpicVgg8F3beow@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZxD6cVFajwBlC9eN@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Hi netdev maintainers,
I see patchwork has failed again. It claims this series does not have a
cover letter, but it does, and lore has it:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZxD6cVFajwBlC9eN@shell.armlinux.org.uk/
vs
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/E1t1P3X-000EJx-ES@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk/
I guess the kernel.org infrastructure has failed in some way to deliver
the cover message to patchwork.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 12:52:17PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've found yet more potential for cleanups in the XPCS driver.
>
> The first patch switches to using generic register definitions.
>
> Next, there's an overly complex bit of code in xpcs_link_up_1000basex()
> which can be simplified down to a simple if() statement.
>
> Then, rearrange xpcs_link_up_1000basex() to separate out the warnings
> from the functional bit.
>
> Next, realising that the functional bit is just the helper function we
> already have and are using in the SGMII version of this function,
> switch over to that.
>
> We can now see that xpcs_link_up_1000basex() and xpcs_link_up_sgmii()
> are basically functionally identical except for the warnings, so merge
> the two functions.
>
> Next, xpcs_config_usxgmii() seems misnamed, so rename it to follow the
> established pattern.
>
> Lastly, "return foo();" where foo is a void function and the function
> being returned from is also void is a weird programming pattern.
> Replace this with something more conventional.
>
> With these changes, we see yet another reduction in the amount of
> code in this driver.
>
> drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c | 134 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.h | 12 ----
> 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
>
> --
> RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
>
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-22 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-17 11:52 [PATCH net-next 0/7] net: pcs: xpcs: yet more cleanups Russell King (Oracle)
2024-10-17 11:52 ` [PATCH net-next 1/7] net: pcs: xpcs: use generic register definitions Russell King (Oracle)
2024-10-17 11:52 ` [PATCH net-next 2/7] net: pcs: xpcs: remove switch() in xpcs_link_up_1000basex() Russell King (Oracle)
2024-10-17 11:52 ` [PATCH net-next 3/7] net: pcs: xpcs: rearrange xpcs_link_up_1000basex() Russell King (Oracle)
2024-10-17 11:52 ` [PATCH net-next 4/7] net: pcs: xpcs: replace open-coded mii_bmcr_encode_fixed() Russell King (Oracle)
2024-10-17 11:52 ` [PATCH net-next 5/7] net: pcs: xpcs: combine xpcs_link_up_{1000basex,sgmii}() Russell King (Oracle)
2024-10-17 11:53 ` [PATCH net-next 6/7] net: pcs: xpcs: rename xpcs_config_usxgmii() Russell King (Oracle)
2024-10-17 11:53 ` [PATCH net-next 7/7] net: pcs: xpcs: remove return statements in void function Russell King (Oracle)
2024-10-21 11:08 ` [PATCH net-next 0/7] net: pcs: xpcs: yet more cleanups Serge Semin
2024-10-22 21:42 ` Serge Semin
2024-10-22 8:59 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2024-10-22 9:23 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-10-22 9:30 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-10-23 11:17 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-10-23 11:58 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-10-28 21:07 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-10-23 14:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZxdpicVgg8F3beow@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).