From: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] dql: annotate data-races around dql->last_obj_cnt
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 12:34:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZyE4sn-F0ed9YQFQ@LQ3V64L9R2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241029191425.2519085-1-edumazet@google.com>
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 07:14:25PM +0000, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> dql->last_obj_cnt is read/written from different contexts,
> without any lock synchronization.
>
> Use READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() to avoid load/store tearing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> ---
> include/linux/dynamic_queue_limits.h | 2 +-
> lib/dynamic_queue_limits.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/dynamic_queue_limits.h b/include/linux/dynamic_queue_limits.h
> index 281298e77a1579cba1f92a3b3f03b8be089fd38f..808b1a5102e7c0bbbcd9676b0dacadad2f0ee49a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dynamic_queue_limits.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dynamic_queue_limits.h
> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ static inline void dql_queued(struct dql *dql, unsigned int count)
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(count > DQL_MAX_OBJECT))
> return;
>
> - dql->last_obj_cnt = count;
> + WRITE_ONCE(dql->last_obj_cnt, count);
>
> /* We want to force a write first, so that cpu do not attempt
> * to get cache line containing last_obj_cnt, num_queued, adj_limit
> diff --git a/lib/dynamic_queue_limits.c b/lib/dynamic_queue_limits.c
> index e49deddd3de9fe9e98d6712559cf48d12a0a2537..c1b7638a594ac43f947e00decabbd3468dcb53de 100644
> --- a/lib/dynamic_queue_limits.c
> +++ b/lib/dynamic_queue_limits.c
> @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ void dql_completed(struct dql *dql, unsigned int count)
>
> dql->adj_limit = limit + completed;
> dql->prev_ovlimit = ovlimit;
> - dql->prev_last_obj_cnt = dql->last_obj_cnt;
> + dql->prev_last_obj_cnt = READ_ONCE(dql->last_obj_cnt);
> dql->num_completed = completed;
> dql->prev_num_queued = num_queued;
>
This looks fine to me. I noted that dql_reset writes last_obj_cnt,
but AFAIU that write is not a problem (from the 1 driver I looked
at).
Reviewed-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-29 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-29 19:14 [PATCH net-next] dql: annotate data-races around dql->last_obj_cnt Eric Dumazet
2024-10-29 19:34 ` Joe Damato [this message]
2024-10-29 19:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-11-01 2:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZyE4sn-F0ed9YQFQ@LQ3V64L9R2 \
--to=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox