From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7CB31D54F4; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:15:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730816157; cv=none; b=UTn2RFcG1wq+TEZcuOBX/3gFBz3Lty40EG4W/We6reHIMgPHjGsNvhuft1nUZjZkqfI+NQIsidlVPt2x0ecvZdh1yAHjo7X8RPkiDsDevSDFVUnqJbnz2d0vvL+/pOpWze9Aa+V54AQj8KjaNvL9hvnEP4LTV6z9l89IKllxMDI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730816157; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UwUee+AJ5IsJhO3fm3A0MDvNU56xubXQY38rELKG15w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=NDFxkmxt03vk7avbW0BENwaYgmIwIWvY4IGoQ7s28Koa94+elNr6x7JMKgTk1FxuGib0YkVF2bytsiJzMCW8Ercx/Hy7i6vBk8cyef9iwk903OQZaS79vv39H7U4Z8XE+w1uSl9NuMQ5BC7Sd7KIw3bqeITKStnEnVYuaWFxHjM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=bW4/qWqh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="bW4/qWqh" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1730816156; x=1762352156; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=UwUee+AJ5IsJhO3fm3A0MDvNU56xubXQY38rELKG15w=; b=bW4/qWqhdPHzQbs3Ms0XIEcgBwqWR+5gaAgoToXl0N+6+NQqtMGEfvqg DikRkpT7z+8cJ/CjipbsRP4heHIOsjpEnF5ceDKacESgOH7w3bbQsDApa /a72VFaMr3U8AfZ/JVHwt8UtBu/88sHZY64hAZeG0QlzlETdc3+vyyXco YLq5jiK7QLIzdxY6wnTY5EOGPU5fkrujAFwiaGtt4BM9573+Hgc1H81E+ oiRqoogSZ7/YINNikz7SQvroSFfs+Pjs0BXtxMSty8W9OABHlXYy7yeqg wsMLl/+fB5ayg49TcpOEYEwpcCilPD3928WIrpUeXf72aBs6LlXPHVGeV Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: kyp6rP1ARFqtb0ab/ckyGg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: fSmwV0IrR0SkIcXoWd1s1g== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11222"; a="30415132" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,199,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="30415132" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Nov 2024 06:15:56 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: zojLoOgPTVa/8rTxwMe0KQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: bf8+OHs/QBa1yWseXVvYTQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,260,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="84158056" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.154]) by fmviesa009.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Nov 2024 06:15:54 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1t8KLX-0000000BQUO-2vQG; Tue, 05 Nov 2024 16:15:51 +0200 Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:15:51 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] nfc: mrvl: Don't use "proxy" headers Message-ID: References: <20241101083910.3362945-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20241103081740.7bc006c1@kernel.org> <20241104182941.342c3b7a@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241104182941.342c3b7a@kernel.org> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 06:29:41PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 10:15:02 +0200 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > So, you are welcome to help developing such a tool. > > FTR I find saying such things to maintains very, very rude. Sorry, it wasn't meant to be that. Let me elaborate. The tool is really what we need, but seems nobody is ready to invest time into its appearance. It would great and appreciated to have a consolidated work towards that. > > Can we have this being applied meanwhile, please? It's a showstopper for > > getting rid of of_gpio.h rather sooner than later. > > Doing this cleanup as part of deleting a deprecated header seems legit. > But you need to say that in the commit message. Thanks for review, I will address then in next version. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko