From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <jv@jvosburgh.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Question]: should we consider arp missed max during bond_ab_arp_probe()?
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 09:25:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zys2Clf0NGeVGl3D@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZysqM_T8f5qDetmk@nanopsycho.orion>
On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 09:34:59AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 08:39:48AM CET, liuhangbin@gmail.com wrote:
> >Hi Jay,
> >
> >Our QE reported that, when there is no active slave during
> >bond_ab_arp_probe(), the slaves send the arp probe message one by one. This
> >will flap the switch's mac table quickly, sometimes even make the switch stop
> >learning mac address. So should we consider the arp missed max during
> >bond_ab_arp_probe()? i.e. each slave has more chances to send probe messages
> >before switch to another slave. What do you think?
>
> Out of curiosity, is anyone still using AB mode in real life? And if
Based on our analyse, in year 2024, there are 53.8% users using 802.3ad mode,
41.6% users using active-backup mode. 2.5% users using round-robin mode.
> yes, any idea why exacly?
I think they just want to make sure there is a backup for the link.
Thanks
Hangbin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-06 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-06 7:39 [Question]: should we consider arp missed max during bond_ab_arp_probe()? Hangbin Liu
2024-11-06 8:34 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-11-06 9:25 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2024-11-06 14:40 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-11-07 1:21 ` Hangbin Liu
2024-11-07 1:21 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-11-08 1:32 ` Jay Vosburgh
2024-11-08 2:51 ` Hangbin Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zys2Clf0NGeVGl3D@fedora \
--to=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).