From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f176.google.com (mail-pl1-f176.google.com [209.85.214.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DC001D54F2 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2024 09:25:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.176 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730885137; cv=none; b=VKLAnVL9qoI0JtBmT6IvfsdgiEX4VlDEs0CaADCW4Dtvtg52A1QC1wvSWT8UcXfZtogV5dZwPUMa2QZYtNjhAno02MQVBxkQS+gPNFwPYq9l7DlseOtpoNzK5MEq0q7cFP+/JUQCdQHGGPwwGsLLSWrrecvUmdm3WYbxQtMuQFg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730885137; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Vg3irSEbuhmpXQovVj2ihzBCFndIs1U0sMSPT2KP6oA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=uArFprIB6Kc4saac0bJPDWHY4D9Orrgx7oWfHqSJeOvXerFrFi5dUOARpg92MoeOOsXjMe660GjHUm5u3FpWElYD4fv+FGoZo60i1AoW0E5lD1AucMZObbmZje+AJI8wKc6jSrroMTjp5G4ElMdXYxSuYbtU9I9pk/ZFWgb4q+A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=hLx0wJSv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.176 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="hLx0wJSv" Received: by mail-pl1-f176.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-20c714cd9c8so66132455ad.0 for ; Wed, 06 Nov 2024 01:25:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1730885136; x=1731489936; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=bHWQude9/8/s2DU++7CNla/VfF5xLcV0pRxg+VwWGE8=; b=hLx0wJSvJKT/h5yZ9x6iYA8GcBsZ3ITF7mlHwv9cnEa6kfjBCMMZqGpj3JcstKyf82 dZ7JWxSEor6AeDS85vmrnTIezNYq7CENPOHsQbrBExYz8ru2sqaKa/FYYQ2Iz+oJALHD IDlf0mcVRRooCIzU/QEkBKHhKRnaJU3c4PiSXKU9zygrMdZzAOZas8i/qXCmmYQzj55G 9zadpzfeihnnBesAMpByUrHq0/NVjcnHc5aJ876GrgG/Fc2JT9mz9jEE2Jbt3nP2sP00 SVNAMg29l9cT3v/qpK2bhNuWp5m/zfBtqySwnuReL795BCda7n0Cd9g1XI//zS9/vJdu gZeA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1730885136; x=1731489936; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=bHWQude9/8/s2DU++7CNla/VfF5xLcV0pRxg+VwWGE8=; b=TeOLiTapnVaSLA8sIuaIZTX32EU2/l2qHBrUBnXcRBvB+iI2TFEoy98pfrB9SSIZY+ SYAd67o3ox4t+DhYxj/Kr2EL9tK53Kgss5xtCr3PtwC7pkmr2v4DddwdotvPi0n+gX5u oXlaweguchRFDLL9EIIFEqbVcPyWIsIFfgD/bWIcaTWGu3AWi4Bw6bH3YFBKk/wxKRxl GXXhA++Qtmye44LSjDJxtqadXZqjc7tVSaDWWnBcyCk9zew5Tj6OU2Yd5CYr6245faDi jVCApDGrf3SMWIawtXZE+inHfPiwcxRjPM0RFOdhgxe6w+SiVWiYAylyXIAbfhKyjvAO Qy7Q== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWQZnJWfejJ1zfzE/mU9ZXh1sH2FLCqW/SEF01jBgCz6eylpz2f7FmDaFg0LnERJ1dgrKk1xlE=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx6rVtqdaWROzvGCc8jsOHOvYu6odXdMaEb6eDiMsRaJF2VfCjp iBM+z6b/9rMitGhhNx+Q7Tc3Jq4lsrDTDBVm1zfk6ieFGtQlzQL9C06/eAqFP9Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH47Kwtk22jfkwVIdu4nwSs0lKgC4kXCaEPUvYzZxLxKsck08Fj5syGPZRCF6arI2FyZbKrRQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:8c8:b0:211:6b25:d824 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2116b25e37bmr32883155ad.35.1730885135498; Wed, 06 Nov 2024 01:25:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from fedora ([43.228.180.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-2110570891esm91339525ad.104.2024.11.06.01.25.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 06 Nov 2024 01:25:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 09:25:30 +0000 From: Hangbin Liu To: Jiri Pirko Cc: Jay Vosburgh , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Question]: should we consider arp missed max during bond_ab_arp_probe()? Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 09:34:59AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: > Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 08:39:48AM CET, liuhangbin@gmail.com wrote: > >Hi Jay, > > > >Our QE reported that, when there is no active slave during > >bond_ab_arp_probe(), the slaves send the arp probe message one by one. This > >will flap the switch's mac table quickly, sometimes even make the switch stop > >learning mac address. So should we consider the arp missed max during > >bond_ab_arp_probe()? i.e. each slave has more chances to send probe messages > >before switch to another slave. What do you think? > > Out of curiosity, is anyone still using AB mode in real life? And if Based on our analyse, in year 2024, there are 53.8% users using 802.3ad mode, 41.6% users using active-backup mode. 2.5% users using round-robin mode. > yes, any idea why exacly? I think they just want to make sure there is a backup for the link. Thanks Hangbin